Costa Cruises vs Qibla Finder for Wear OS

Costa Cruises

Costa Crociere S.p.A.
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 2.8M installs
VS

Qibla Finder for Wear OS

Limoo
Google Play
$6/mo
~$69/yr · 485 installs
Revenue winner Qibla Finder for Wear OS wins +600% vs other
Installs winner Costa Cruises wins +570809% vs other
MAU winner Costa Cruises wins +424293% vs other
Rating winner Costa Cruises wins +367% vs other

Why Qibla Finder for Wear OS is winning

Top 1 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Qibla Finder for Wear OS earns roughly 6× more per month than Costa Cruises - $6 vs $0.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Qibla Finder for Wear OS report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Costa Cruises
vs
Qibla Finder for Wear OS
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
$6
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
$69
Lifetime installs (est.)
2.8M
485
Monthly active users (est.)?
233K
54.805
App Store rating
3.67★
-
Total ratings
7K
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers

Costa Cruises

Costa Crociere S.p.A.
Google Play
Category
Travel & Local
Price
Free
Released
Jan 30, 2018
Last updated
Jun 30, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
5.3.0
Languages
-
View full Costa Cruises report →

Qibla Finder for Wear OS

Limoo
Google Play
Category
Travel & Local
Price
USD0.99
Released
Jul 18, 2023
Last updated
Oct 5, 2023
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
3.3
Languages
-
View full Qibla Finder for Wear OS report →

Costa Cruises trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

Qibla Finder for Wear OS trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

FAQ

Which makes more money, Costa Cruises or Qibla Finder for Wear OS? v
Qibla Finder for Wear OS earns about $6 per month, while Costa Cruises earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$6 more per month for Qibla Finder for Wear OS). Annual revenue: Costa Cruises ≈ $0/year, Qibla Finder for Wear OS ≈ $69/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Costa Cruises or Qibla Finder for Wear OS? v
Costa Cruises leads with about 2.8M estimated downloads vs 485 for Qibla Finder for Wear OS - a 5709.1× gap. Costa Cruises reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Qibla Finder for Wear OS reports 100+ installs on Google Play.
Are Costa Cruises and Qibla Finder for Wear OS in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Travel & Local category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do Costa Cruises and Qibla Finder for Wear OS have in-app purchases? v
Costa Cruises does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Qibla Finder for Wear OS does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Costa Cruises runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)", Qibla Finder for Wear OS runs "Paid app ($0.99)".
Which has better ratings, Costa Cruises or Qibla Finder for Wear OS? v
Costa Cruises edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 3.7 stars). Rating volume: Costa Cruises 28 ratings, Qibla Finder for Wear OS 0 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Costa Cruises vs Qibla Finder for Wear OS revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for Costa Cruises and $6 for Qibla Finder for Wear OS are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Travel & Local) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Costa Cruises or Qibla Finder for Wear OS to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.