Cronometer: Calorie Counter vs Google Health (Fitbit)
Cronometer: Calorie Counter
Cronometer Software Inc.
Google Play
$484.9K/mo
~$5.82M/yr · 5.7M installs
VS
Google Health (Fitbit)
Google LLC
Google Play
$5.71M/mo
~$68.56M/yr · 266.8M installs
Revenue winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+1078% vs other
Installs winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+4583% vs other
MAU winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+1006% vs other
Rating winner
Cronometer: Calorie Counter wins
+22% vs other
Why Google Health (Fitbit) is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Google Health (Fitbit) earns roughly 12× more per month than Cronometer: Calorie Counter - $5.71M vs $484.9K.
- Premium pricing. Google Health (Fitbit) charges $28.27/mo vs Cronometer: Calorie Counter's $16.40/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Google Health (Fitbit) has ~266.8M lifetime installs vs Cronometer: Calorie Counter's ~5.7M - 46.8× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Google Health (Fitbit) report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Cronometer: Calorie Counter
vs
Google Health (Fitbit)
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$484.9K
▶
$5.71M
Annual revenue (est.)
$5.82M
▶
$68.56M
Lifetime installs (est.)
5.7M
▶
266.8M
Monthly active users (est.)?
820K
▶
9.1M
App Store rating
4.60★
◀
3.78★
Total ratings
55K
▶
1.3M
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$16.40
▶
$28.27
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 13, 2016
- Last updated
- Jun 22, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Mar 16, 2012
- Last updated
- Jun 18, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
Cronometer: Calorie Counter trajectory
Google Health (Fitbit) trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Cronometer: Calorie Counter or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
Google Health (Fitbit) earns about $5.71M per month, while Cronometer: Calorie Counter earns about $484.9K. That is a 11.8× revenue gap (~$5.23M more per month for Google Health (Fitbit)). Annual revenue: Cronometer: Calorie Counter ≈ $5.82M/year, Google Health (Fitbit) ≈ $68.56M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Cronometer: Calorie Counter or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
Google Health (Fitbit) leads with about 266.8M estimated downloads vs 5.7M for Cronometer: Calorie Counter - a 46.8× gap. Cronometer: Calorie Counter reports 5,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Google Health (Fitbit) reports 100,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Cronometer: Calorie Counter and Google Health (Fitbit) in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Cronometer: Calorie Counter and Google Health (Fitbit) offer? v
Cronometer: Calorie Counter: IAP range $2.99 - $89.99 per item. Google Health (Fitbit): IAP range $7.99 - $99.99 per item. Cronometer: Calorie Counter runs a "Subscription (~$16.40/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Google Health (Fitbit) runs "Subscription (~$28.27/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Cronometer: Calorie Counter or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
Cronometer: Calorie Counter edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 3.8 (gap of 0.8 stars). Rating volume: Cronometer: Calorie Counter 8K ratings, Google Health (Fitbit) 250K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Cronometer: Calorie Counter vs Google Health (Fitbit) revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $484.9K for Cronometer: Calorie Counter and $5.71M for Google Health (Fitbit) are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Cronometer: Calorie Counter or Google Health (Fitbit) to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.