Cronometer: Calorie Counter vs Reframe: Cut Back on Alcohol
Cronometer: Calorie Counter
Cronometer Software Inc.
Google Play
$464.6K/mo
~$5.58M/yr · 5.4M installs
VS
Reframe: Cut Back on Alcohol
Glucobit Inc.
Google Play
$66.5K/mo
~$798.6K/yr · 615K installs
Revenue winner
Cronometer: Calorie Counter wins
+598% vs other
Installs winner
Cronometer: Calorie Counter wins
+787% vs other
MAU winner
Cronometer: Calorie Counter wins
+572% vs other
Rating winner
Cronometer: Calorie Counter wins
+4% vs other
Why Cronometer: Calorie Counter is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Cronometer: Calorie Counter earns roughly 7× more per month than Reframe: Cut Back on Alcohol - $464.6K vs $66.5K.
- Aggressive pricing. Cronometer: Calorie Counter undercuts at $16.40/mo vs $19.98/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Cronometer: Calorie Counter has ~5.4M lifetime installs vs Reframe: Cut Back on Alcohol's ~615K - 8.9× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Cronometer: Calorie Counter report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Cronometer: Calorie Counter
vs
Reframe: Cut Back on Alcohol
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$464.6K
◀
$66.5K
Annual revenue (est.)
$5.58M
◀
$798.6K
Lifetime installs (est.)
5.4M
◀
615K
Monthly active users (est.)?
785K
◀
117K
App Store rating
4.63★
◀
4.47★
Total ratings
53K
◀
5K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$16.40
▶
$19.98
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 13, 2016
- Last updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- May 25, 2023
- Last updated
- Apr 24, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 2.1.124
- Languages
- -
Cronometer: Calorie Counter trajectory
Reframe: Cut Back on Alcohol trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Cronometer: Calorie Counter or Reframe: Cut Back on Alcohol? v
Cronometer: Calorie Counter earns about $464.6K per month, while Reframe: Cut Back on Alcohol earns about $66.5K. That is a 7.0× revenue gap (~$398.1K more per month for Cronometer: Calorie Counter). Annual revenue: Cronometer: Calorie Counter ≈ $5.58M/year, Reframe: Cut Back on Alcohol ≈ $798.6K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Cronometer: Calorie Counter or Reframe: Cut Back on Alcohol? v
Cronometer: Calorie Counter leads with about 5.4M estimated downloads vs 615K for Reframe: Cut Back on Alcohol - a 8.9× gap. Cronometer: Calorie Counter reports 5,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Reframe: Cut Back on Alcohol reports 500,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Cronometer: Calorie Counter and Reframe: Cut Back on Alcohol in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Cronometer: Calorie Counter and Reframe: Cut Back on Alcohol offer? v
Cronometer: Calorie Counter: IAP range $2.99 - $89.99 per item. Reframe: Cut Back on Alcohol: IAP range $4.99 - $79.99 per item. Cronometer: Calorie Counter runs a "Subscription (~$16.40/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Reframe: Cut Back on Alcohol runs "Subscription (~$19.98/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Cronometer: Calorie Counter or Reframe: Cut Back on Alcohol? v
Cronometer: Calorie Counter edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Cronometer: Calorie Counter 8K ratings, Reframe: Cut Back on Alcohol 557 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Cronometer: Calorie Counter vs Reframe: Cut Back on Alcohol revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $464.6K for Cronometer: Calorie Counter and $66.5K for Reframe: Cut Back on Alcohol are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Cronometer: Calorie Counter or Reframe: Cut Back on Alcohol to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.