Cronometer: Calorie Counter vs Weight Loss for Women: Workout
Cronometer: Calorie Counter
Cronometer Software Inc.
Google Play
$464.6K/mo
~$5.58M/yr · 5.4M installs
VS
Weight Loss for Women: Workout
EZ Health
Google Play
$2.81M/mo
~$33.68M/yr · 43.2M installs
Revenue winner
Weight Loss for Women: Workout wins
+504% vs other
Installs winner
Weight Loss for Women: Workout wins
+693% vs other
MAU winner
Weight Loss for Women: Workout wins
+379% vs other
Rating winner
Weight Loss for Women: Workout wins
+4% vs other
Why Weight Loss for Women: Workout is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Weight Loss for Women: Workout earns roughly 6× more per month than Cronometer: Calorie Counter - $2.81M vs $464.6K.
- Premium pricing. Weight Loss for Women: Workout charges $25.81/mo vs Cronometer: Calorie Counter's $16.40/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Weight Loss for Women: Workout has ~43.2M lifetime installs vs Cronometer: Calorie Counter's ~5.4M - 7.9× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Weight Loss for Women: Workout report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Cronometer: Calorie Counter
vs
Weight Loss for Women: Workout
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$464.6K
▶
$2.81M
Annual revenue (est.)
$5.58M
▶
$33.68M
Lifetime installs (est.)
5.4M
▶
43.2M
Monthly active users (est.)?
785K
▶
3.8M
App Store rating
4.63★
▶
4.79★
Total ratings
53K
▶
419K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$16.40
▶
$25.81
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 13, 2016
- Last updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Mar 6, 2023
- Last updated
- Apr 9, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.9.5
- Languages
- -
Cronometer: Calorie Counter trajectory
Weight Loss for Women: Workout trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Cronometer: Calorie Counter or Weight Loss for Women: Workout? v
Weight Loss for Women: Workout earns about $2.81M per month, while Cronometer: Calorie Counter earns about $464.6K. That is a 6.0× revenue gap (~$2.34M more per month for Weight Loss for Women: Workout). Annual revenue: Cronometer: Calorie Counter ≈ $5.58M/year, Weight Loss for Women: Workout ≈ $33.68M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Cronometer: Calorie Counter or Weight Loss for Women: Workout? v
Weight Loss for Women: Workout leads with about 43.2M estimated downloads vs 5.4M for Cronometer: Calorie Counter - a 7.9× gap. Cronometer: Calorie Counter reports 5,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Weight Loss for Women: Workout reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Cronometer: Calorie Counter and Weight Loss for Women: Workout in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Cronometer: Calorie Counter and Weight Loss for Women: Workout offer? v
Cronometer: Calorie Counter: IAP range $2.99 - $89.99 per item. Weight Loss for Women: Workout: IAP range $8.33 - $79.99 per item. Cronometer: Calorie Counter runs a "Subscription (~$16.40/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Weight Loss for Women: Workout runs "Subscription (~$25.81/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Cronometer: Calorie Counter or Weight Loss for Women: Workout? v
Weight Loss for Women: Workout edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Cronometer: Calorie Counter 8K ratings, Weight Loss for Women: Workout 7K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Cronometer: Calorie Counter vs Weight Loss for Women: Workout revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $464.6K for Cronometer: Calorie Counter and $2.81M for Weight Loss for Women: Workout are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Cronometer: Calorie Counter or Weight Loss for Women: Workout to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.