Cronometer: Calorie Counter vs BitePal: AI Calorie Counter
Cronometer: Calorie Counter
Cronometer Software Inc
App Store
$1.17M/mo
~$14.05M/yr · 3.2M installs
VS
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter
RefaceLithuania
Google Play
$313.2K/mo
~$3.76M/yr · 3.8M installs
Revenue winner
Cronometer: Calorie Counter wins
+274% vs other
Installs winner
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter wins
+21% vs other
MAU winner
Cronometer: Calorie Counter wins
+68% vs other
Rating winner
Cronometer: Calorie Counter wins
+5% vs other
Why Cronometer: Calorie Counter is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Cronometer: Calorie Counter earns roughly 4× more per month than BitePal: AI Calorie Counter - $1.17M vs $313.2K.
- Premium pricing. Cronometer: Calorie Counter charges $12.00/mo vs BitePal: AI Calorie Counter's $8.90/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Cronometer: Calorie Counter report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Cronometer: Calorie Counter
vs
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$1.17M
◀
$313.2K
Annual revenue (est.)
$14.05M
◀
$3.76M
Lifetime installs (est.)
3.2M
▶
3.8M
Monthly active users (est.)?
926K
◀
550K
App Store rating
4.77★
◀
4.53★
Total ratings
91K
▶
286K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$12.00
◀
$8.90
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Sep 9, 2016
- Last updated
- Apr 29, 2026
- File size
- 129.1 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 4.54.0
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- May 3, 2024
- Last updated
- Apr 30, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 2.13.1
- Languages
- -
Cronometer: Calorie Counter trajectory
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Cronometer: Calorie Counter or BitePal: AI Calorie Counter? v
Cronometer: Calorie Counter earns about $1.17M per month, while BitePal: AI Calorie Counter earns about $313.2K. That is a 3.7× revenue gap (~$857.2K more per month for Cronometer: Calorie Counter). Annual revenue: Cronometer: Calorie Counter ≈ $14.05M/year, BitePal: AI Calorie Counter ≈ $3.76M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Cronometer: Calorie Counter or BitePal: AI Calorie Counter? v
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter leads with about 3.8M estimated downloads vs 3.2M for Cronometer: Calorie Counter - a 1.2× gap. Cronometer: Calorie Counter's App Store downloads are estimated from 91K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Cronometer: Calorie Counter and BitePal: AI Calorie Counter in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Cronometer: Calorie Counter and BitePal: AI Calorie Counter offer? v
Cronometer: Calorie Counter: no IAP detected on the public listing. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter: IAP range $0.99 - $79.99 per item. Cronometer: Calorie Counter runs a "Subscription (~$12.00/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; BitePal: AI Calorie Counter runs "Subscription (~$8.90/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Cronometer: Calorie Counter or BitePal: AI Calorie Counter? v
Cronometer: Calorie Counter edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Cronometer: Calorie Counter 91K ratings, BitePal: AI Calorie Counter 2K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Cronometer: Calorie Counter vs BitePal: AI Calorie Counter revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $1.17M for Cronometer: Calorie Counter and $313.2K for BitePal: AI Calorie Counter are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Cronometer: Calorie Counter or BitePal: AI Calorie Counter to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.