Cronometer: Calorie Counter vs Fitbit: Health & Fitness
Cronometer: Calorie Counter
Cronometer Software Inc
App Store
$491.9K/mo
~$5.90M/yr · 3.2M installs
VS
Fitbit: Health & Fitness
Google
App Store
$2.71M/mo
~$32.47M/yr · 98.7M installs
Revenue winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+450% vs other
Installs winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+3009% vs other
MAU winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+1257% vs other
Rating winner
Cronometer: Calorie Counter wins
+5% vs other
Why Fitbit: Health & Fitness is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns roughly 6× more per month than Cronometer: Calorie Counter - $2.71M vs $491.9K.
- Aggressive pricing. Fitbit: Health & Fitness undercuts at $9.99/mo vs $10.99/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Fitbit: Health & Fitness has ~98.7M lifetime installs vs Cronometer: Calorie Counter's ~3.2M - 31.1× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fitbit: Health & Fitness report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Cronometer: Calorie Counter
vs
Fitbit: Health & Fitness
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$491.9K
▶
$2.71M
Annual revenue (est.)
$5.90M
▶
$32.47M
Lifetime installs (est.)
3.2M
▶
98.7M
Monthly active users (est.)?
924K
▶
12.5M
App Store rating
4.77★
◀
4.53★
Total ratings
91K
▶
658K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$10.99
◀
$9.99
IAP tiers detected
5 tiers
◀
2 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Sep 9, 2016
- Last updated
- Apr 29, 2026
- File size
- 129.1 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 4.54.0
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 18, 2011
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- 450.2 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 4.69
- Languages
- Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, ET, Finnish +22 more
Cronometer: Calorie Counter trajectory
Fitbit: Health & Fitness trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Cronometer: Calorie Counter or Fitbit: Health & Fitness? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns about $2.71M per month, while Cronometer: Calorie Counter earns about $491.9K. That is a 5.5× revenue gap (~$2.21M more per month for Fitbit: Health & Fitness). Annual revenue: Cronometer: Calorie Counter ≈ $5.90M/year, Fitbit: Health & Fitness ≈ $32.47M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Cronometer: Calorie Counter or Fitbit: Health & Fitness? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness leads with about 98.7M estimated downloads vs 3.2M for Cronometer: Calorie Counter - a 31.1× gap. Cronometer: Calorie Counter's App Store downloads are estimated from 91K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Fitbit: Health & Fitness's App Store downloads are estimated from 658K ratings.
Are Cronometer: Calorie Counter and Fitbit: Health & Fitness in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Cronometer: Calorie Counter and Fitbit: Health & Fitness offer? v
Cronometer: Calorie Counter: IAP range 5 tiers detected. Fitbit: Health & Fitness: IAP range 2 tiers detected. Cronometer: Calorie Counter runs a "Subscription (~$10.99/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Fitbit: Health & Fitness runs "Subscription (~$6.67/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Cronometer: Calorie Counter or Fitbit: Health & Fitness? v
Cronometer: Calorie Counter edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Cronometer: Calorie Counter 91K ratings, Fitbit: Health & Fitness 658K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Cronometer: Calorie Counter vs Fitbit: Health & Fitness revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $491.9K for Cronometer: Calorie Counter and $2.71M for Fitbit: Health & Fitness are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Cronometer: Calorie Counter or Fitbit: Health & Fitness to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.