Cronometer: Calorie Counter vs Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker
Cronometer: Calorie Counter
Cronometer Software Inc.
Google Play
$464.6K/mo
~$5.58M/yr · 5.4M installs
VS
Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker
Y7 Technology
Google Play
$166/mo
~$2.0K/yr · 1K installs
Revenue winner
Cronometer: Calorie Counter wins
+279787% vs other
Installs winner
Cronometer: Calorie Counter wins
+513066% vs other
MAU winner
Cronometer: Calorie Counter wins
+268613% vs other
Rating winner
Cronometer: Calorie Counter wins
+463% vs other
Why Cronometer: Calorie Counter is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Cronometer: Calorie Counter earns roughly 2799× more per month than Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker - $464.6K vs $166.
- Premium pricing. Cronometer: Calorie Counter charges $16.40/mo vs Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker's $2.08/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Cronometer: Calorie Counter has ~5.4M lifetime installs vs Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker's ~1K - 5131.7× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Cronometer: Calorie Counter sits at 4.63★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Cronometer: Calorie Counter report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Cronometer: Calorie Counter
vs
Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$464.6K
◀
$166
Annual revenue (est.)
$5.58M
◀
$2.0K
Lifetime installs (est.)
5.4M
◀
1K
Monthly active users (est.)?
785K
◀
292.05
App Store rating
4.63★
◀
-
Total ratings
53K
◀
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$16.40
◀
$2.08
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 13, 2016
- Last updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 23, 2025
- Last updated
- Apr 19, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 2.1.0
- Languages
- -
Cronometer: Calorie Counter trajectory
Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Cronometer: Calorie Counter or Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker? v
Cronometer: Calorie Counter earns about $464.6K per month, while Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker earns about $166. That is a 2798.9× revenue gap (~$464.4K more per month for Cronometer: Calorie Counter). Annual revenue: Cronometer: Calorie Counter ≈ $5.58M/year, Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker ≈ $2.0K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Cronometer: Calorie Counter or Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker? v
Cronometer: Calorie Counter leads with about 5.4M estimated downloads vs 1K for Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker - a 5131.7× gap. Cronometer: Calorie Counter reports 5,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker reports 1,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Cronometer: Calorie Counter and Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Cronometer: Calorie Counter and Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker offer? v
Cronometer: Calorie Counter: IAP range $2.99 - $89.99 per item. Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker: IAP range $25.99 per item. Cronometer: Calorie Counter runs a "Subscription (~$16.40/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker runs "Subscription (~$2.08/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Cronometer: Calorie Counter or Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker? v
Cronometer: Calorie Counter edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.6 stars). Rating volume: Cronometer: Calorie Counter 8K ratings, Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker 0 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Cronometer: Calorie Counter vs Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $464.6K for Cronometer: Calorie Counter and $166 for Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Cronometer: Calorie Counter or Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.