dフォト-写真や動画データをクラウド上にバックアップ保存 vs MemoryRevive

dフォト-写真や動画データをクラウド上にバックアップ保存

NTT DOCOMO
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 2.6M installs
VS

MemoryRevive

MemoryRevive
Google Play
$2/mo
~$21/yr · 15 installs
Revenue winner MemoryRevive wins +200% vs other
Installs winner dフォト-写真や動画データをクラウド上にバックアップ保存 wins +17287333% vs other
MAU winner dフォト-写真や動画データをクラウド上にバックアップ保存 wins +8643617% vs other
Rating winnerTied

Why MemoryRevive is winning

Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. MemoryRevive earns roughly 2× more per month than dフォト-写真や動画データをクラウド上にバックアップ保存 - $2 vs $0.
  2. Subscription model. MemoryRevive runs a $14.48/mo subscription that compounds; dフォト-写真や動画データをクラウド上にバックアップ保存 relies on one-shot IAP or ads.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full MemoryRevive report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

dフォト-写真や動画データをクラウド上にバックアップ保存
vs
MemoryRevive
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
$2
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
$21
Lifetime installs (est.)
2.6M
15
Monthly active users (est.)?
389K
4.5
App Store rating
-
=
-
Total ratings
0
=
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
$14.48
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers

dフォト-写真や動画データをクラウド上にバックアップ保存

NTT DOCOMO
Google Play
Category
Photography
Price
Free
Released
-
Last updated
Apr 15, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
0f.00.00002
Languages
-
View full dフォト-写真や動画データをクラウド上にバックアップ保存 report →

MemoryRevive

MemoryRevive
Google Play
Category
Photography
Price
Free
Released
Apr 30, 2026
Last updated
Apr 30, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
1.0.0
Languages
-
View full MemoryRevive report →

dフォト-写真や動画データをクラウド上にバックアップ保存 trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

MemoryRevive trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

FAQ

Which makes more money, dフォト-写真や動画データをクラウド上にバックアップ保存 or MemoryRevive? v
MemoryRevive earns about $2 per month, while dフォト-写真や動画データをクラウド上にバックアップ保存 earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$2 more per month for MemoryRevive). Annual revenue: dフォト-写真や動画データをクラウド上にバックアップ保存 ≈ $0/year, MemoryRevive ≈ $21/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, dフォト-写真や動画データをクラウド上にバックアップ保存 or MemoryRevive? v
dフォト-写真や動画データをクラウド上にバックアップ保存 leads with about 2.6M estimated downloads vs 15 for MemoryRevive - a 172874.3× gap. dフォト-写真や動画データをクラウド上にバックアップ保存 reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. MemoryRevive reports 10+ installs on Google Play.
Are dフォト-写真や動画データをクラウド上にバックアップ保存 and MemoryRevive in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photography category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do dフォト-写真や動画データをクラウド上にバックアップ保存 and MemoryRevive offer? v
dフォト-写真や動画データをクラウド上にバックアップ保存: no IAP detected on the public listing. MemoryRevive: IAP range $5.99 - $34.99 per item. dフォト-写真や動画データをクラウド上にバックアップ保存 runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; MemoryRevive runs "Subscription (~$14.48/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
How accurate are these dフォト-写真や動画データをクラウド上にバックアップ保存 vs MemoryRevive revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for dフォト-写真や動画データをクラウド上にバックアップ保存 and $2 for MemoryRevive are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photography) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare dフォト-写真や動画データをクラウド上にバックアップ保存 or MemoryRevive to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.