d NEOBANK 住信SBIネット銀行-銀行・ネット銀行 vs Trading 212: Stocks, ETFs, ISA
d NEOBANK 住信SBIネット銀行-銀行・ネット銀行
住信SBIネット銀行 株式会社
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 2.5M installs
VS
Trading 212: Stocks, ETFs, ISA
Trading 212
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 18.2M installs
Revenue winnerTied
Installs winner
Trading 212: Stocks, ETFs, ISA wins
+641% vs other
MAU winner
Trading 212: Stocks, ETFs, ISA wins
+379% vs other
Rating winner
Trading 212: Stocks, ETFs, ISA wins
+29% vs other
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
d NEOBANK 住信SBIネット銀行-銀行・ネット銀行
vs
Trading 212: Stocks, ETFs, ISA
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
=
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
=
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
2.5M
▶
18.2M
Monthly active users (est.)?
478K
▶
2.3M
App Store rating
3.50★
▶
4.50★
Total ratings
57K
▶
244K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Finance
- Price
- Free
- Released
- -
- Last updated
- Apr 13, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 21.4.1
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Finance
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 27, 2013
- Last updated
- May 8, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 8.28.1
- Languages
- -
d NEOBANK 住信SBIネット銀行-銀行・ネット銀行 trajectory
Trading 212: Stocks, ETFs, ISA trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, d NEOBANK 住信SBIネット銀行-銀行・ネット銀行 or Trading 212: Stocks, ETFs, ISA? v
Trading 212: Stocks, ETFs, ISA earns about $0 per month, while d NEOBANK 住信SBIネット銀行-銀行・ネット銀行 earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap. Annual revenue: d NEOBANK 住信SBIネット銀行-銀行・ネット銀行 ≈ $0/year, Trading 212: Stocks, ETFs, ISA ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, d NEOBANK 住信SBIネット銀行-銀行・ネット銀行 or Trading 212: Stocks, ETFs, ISA? v
Trading 212: Stocks, ETFs, ISA leads with about 18.2M estimated downloads vs 2.5M for d NEOBANK 住信SBIネット銀行-銀行・ネット銀行 - a 7.4× gap. d NEOBANK 住信SBIネット銀行-銀行・ネット銀行 reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Trading 212: Stocks, ETFs, ISA reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are d NEOBANK 住信SBIネット銀行-銀行・ネット銀行 and Trading 212: Stocks, ETFs, ISA in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Finance category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do d NEOBANK 住信SBIネット銀行-銀行・ネット銀行 and Trading 212: Stocks, ETFs, ISA have in-app purchases? v
d NEOBANK 住信SBIネット銀行-銀行・ネット銀行 does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Trading 212: Stocks, ETFs, ISA does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: d NEOBANK 住信SBIネット銀行-銀行・ネット銀行 runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)", Trading 212: Stocks, ETFs, ISA runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)".
Which has better ratings, d NEOBANK 住信SBIネット銀行-銀行・ネット銀行 or Trading 212: Stocks, ETFs, ISA? v
Trading 212: Stocks, ETFs, ISA edges ahead with ★ 4.5 vs ★ 3.5 (gap of 1.0 stars). Rating volume: d NEOBANK 住信SBIネット銀行-銀行・ネット銀行 1 ratings, Trading 212: Stocks, ETFs, ISA 626 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these d NEOBANK 住信SBIネット銀行-銀行・ネット銀行 vs Trading 212: Stocks, ETFs, ISA revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for d NEOBANK 住信SBIネット銀行-銀行・ネット銀行 and $0 for Trading 212: Stocks, ETFs, ISA are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Finance) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare d NEOBANK 住信SBIネット銀行-銀行・ネット銀行 or Trading 212: Stocks, ETFs, ISA to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.