DADAM65: Classic Watch Face vs TMF16
DADAM65: Classic Watch Face
DADAM Watch Faces
Google Play
$448/mo
~$5.4K/yr · 20K installs
VS
TMF16
Timefy™
Google Play
$92/mo
~$1.1K/yr · 4K installs
Revenue winner
DADAM65: Classic Watch Face wins
+387% vs other
Installs winner
DADAM65: Classic Watch Face wins
+414% vs other
MAU winner
DADAM65: Classic Watch Face wins
+347% vs other
Rating winner
TMF16 wins
+68% vs other
Why DADAM65: Classic Watch Face is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- DADAM65: Classic Watch Face earns roughly 5× more per month than TMF16 - $448 vs $92.
- Bigger install base. DADAM65: Classic Watch Face has ~20K lifetime installs vs TMF16's ~4K - 5.1× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full DADAM65: Classic Watch Face report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
DADAM65: Classic Watch Face
vs
TMF16
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$448
◀
$92
Annual revenue (est.)
$5.4K
◀
$1.1K
Lifetime installs (est.)
20K
◀
4K
Monthly active users (est.)?
2K
◀
442.06
App Store rating
2.60★
▶
4.38★
Total ratings
77
▶
129
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Personalization
- Price
- USD1.89
- Released
- Dec 4, 2023
- Last updated
- Dec 7, 2025
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Personalization
- Price
- USD1.99
- Released
- Dec 26, 2023
- Last updated
- Jul 23, 2025
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
DADAM65: Classic Watch Face trajectory
TMF16 trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, DADAM65: Classic Watch Face or TMF16? v
DADAM65: Classic Watch Face earns about $448 per month, while TMF16 earns about $92. That is a 4.9× revenue gap (~$356 more per month for DADAM65: Classic Watch Face). Annual revenue: DADAM65: Classic Watch Face ≈ $5.4K/year, TMF16 ≈ $1.1K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, DADAM65: Classic Watch Face or TMF16? v
DADAM65: Classic Watch Face leads with about 20K estimated downloads vs 4K for TMF16 - a 5.1× gap. DADAM65: Classic Watch Face reports 10,000+ installs on Google Play. TMF16 reports 1,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are DADAM65: Classic Watch Face and TMF16 in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Personalization category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do DADAM65: Classic Watch Face and TMF16 have in-app purchases? v
DADAM65: Classic Watch Face does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. TMF16 does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: DADAM65: Classic Watch Face runs "Paid app ($1.89)", TMF16 runs "Paid app ($1.99)".
Which has better ratings, DADAM65: Classic Watch Face or TMF16? v
TMF16 edges ahead with ★ 4.4 vs ★ 2.6 (gap of 1.8 stars). Rating volume: DADAM65: Classic Watch Face 4 ratings, TMF16 7 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these DADAM65: Classic Watch Face vs TMF16 revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $448 for DADAM65: Classic Watch Face and $92 for TMF16 are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Personalization) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare DADAM65: Classic Watch Face or TMF16 to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.