DiDi Rider: Affordable rides vs Lyft

DiDi Rider: Affordable rides

DiDi Global
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 169.1M installs
VS

Lyft

Lyft, Inc.
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 81.1M installs
Revenue winnerTied
Installs winner DiDi Rider: Affordable rides wins +109% vs other
MAU winner Lyft wins +4% vs other
Rating winner Lyft wins +6% vs other

Why DiDi Rider: Affordable rides is winning

Top 1 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Bigger install base. DiDi Rider: Affordable rides has ~169.1M lifetime installs vs Lyft's ~81.1M - 2.1× the funnel top.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full DiDi Rider: Affordable rides report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

DiDi Rider: Affordable rides
vs
Lyft
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
=
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
=
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
169.1M
81.1M
Monthly active users (est.)?
8.8M
9.2M
App Store rating
4.64★
4.93★
Total ratings
1.6M
612K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers

DiDi Rider: Affordable rides

DiDi Global
Google Play
Category
Maps & Navigation
Price
Free
Released
Apr 18, 2018
Last updated
Jul 2, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
7.6.72
Languages
-
View full DiDi Rider: Affordable rides report →

Lyft

Lyft, Inc.
Google Play
Category
Maps & Navigation
Price
Free
Released
Aug 28, 2012
Last updated
Jun 26, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
2026.24.3.1782285594
Languages
-
View full Lyft report →

DiDi Rider: Affordable rides trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

Lyft trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

FAQ

Which makes more money, DiDi Rider: Affordable rides or Lyft? v
Lyft earns about $0 per month, while DiDi Rider: Affordable rides earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap. Annual revenue: DiDi Rider: Affordable rides ≈ $0/year, Lyft ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, DiDi Rider: Affordable rides or Lyft? v
DiDi Rider: Affordable rides leads with about 169.1M estimated downloads vs 81.1M for Lyft - a 2.1× gap. DiDi Rider: Affordable rides reports 100,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Lyft reports 50,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are DiDi Rider: Affordable rides and Lyft in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Maps & Navigation category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do DiDi Rider: Affordable rides and Lyft have in-app purchases? v
DiDi Rider: Affordable rides does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Lyft does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: DiDi Rider: Affordable rides runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)", Lyft runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)".
Which has better ratings, DiDi Rider: Affordable rides or Lyft? v
Lyft edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: DiDi Rider: Affordable rides 6K ratings, Lyft 146K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these DiDi Rider: Affordable rides vs Lyft revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for DiDi Rider: Affordable rides and $0 for Lyft are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Maps & Navigation) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare DiDi Rider: Affordable rides or Lyft to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.