DiDi Rider: Affordable rides vs Melbourne Trams
DiDi Rider: Affordable rides
DiDi
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 3.1M installs
VS
Melbourne Trams
JOhn Lyons
App Store
$11/mo
~$127/yr · 400 installs
Revenue winner
Melbourne Trams wins
+1100% vs other
Installs winner
DiDi Rider: Affordable rides wins
+777848% vs other
MAU winner
DiDi Rider: Affordable rides wins
+1636272% vs other
Rating winner
DiDi Rider: Affordable rides wins
+376% vs other
Why Melbourne Trams is winning
Top 1 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Melbourne Trams earns roughly 11× more per month than DiDi Rider: Affordable rides - $11 vs $0.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Melbourne Trams report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
DiDi Rider: Affordable rides
vs
Melbourne Trams
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$11
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$127
Lifetime installs (est.)
3.1M
◀
400
Monthly active users (est.)?
569K
◀
34.8
App Store rating
4.76★
◀
1.00★
Total ratings
28K
◀
1
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Travel
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 23, 2018
- Last updated
- May 9, 2026
- File size
- 327.6 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 7.6.61
- Languages
- Arabic, English, Japanese, Korean, Chinese, Spanish +1 more
- Category
- Travel
- Price
- USD0.99
- Released
- Oct 25, 2013
- Last updated
- Nov 21, 2022
- File size
- 8.2 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 6
- Languages
- English
DiDi Rider: Affordable rides trajectory
Melbourne Trams trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, DiDi Rider: Affordable rides or Melbourne Trams? v
Melbourne Trams earns about $11 per month, while DiDi Rider: Affordable rides earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$11 more per month for Melbourne Trams). Annual revenue: DiDi Rider: Affordable rides ≈ $0/year, Melbourne Trams ≈ $127/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, DiDi Rider: Affordable rides or Melbourne Trams? v
DiDi Rider: Affordable rides leads with about 3.1M estimated downloads vs 400 for Melbourne Trams - a 7779.5× gap. DiDi Rider: Affordable rides's App Store downloads are estimated from 28K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Melbourne Trams's App Store downloads are estimated from 1 ratings.
Are DiDi Rider: Affordable rides and Melbourne Trams in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Travel category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do DiDi Rider: Affordable rides and Melbourne Trams have in-app purchases? v
DiDi Rider: Affordable rides does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Melbourne Trams does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: DiDi Rider: Affordable rides runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)", Melbourne Trams runs "Paid app ($0.99)".
Which has better ratings, DiDi Rider: Affordable rides or Melbourne Trams? v
DiDi Rider: Affordable rides edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 1.0 (gap of 3.8 stars). Rating volume: DiDi Rider: Affordable rides 28K ratings, Melbourne Trams 1 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these DiDi Rider: Affordable rides vs Melbourne Trams revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for DiDi Rider: Affordable rides and $11 for Melbourne Trams are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Travel) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare DiDi Rider: Affordable rides or Melbourne Trams to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.