Digital RetroFlip Watch face vs NXV43 Elegant Watch Face
Digital RetroFlip Watch face
GoWer watch faces
Google Play
$100/mo
~$1.2K/yr · 6K installs
VS
NXV43 Elegant Watch Face
NXV Watch Face
Google Play
$138/mo
~$1.7K/yr · 7K installs
Revenue winner
NXV43 Elegant Watch Face wins
+38% vs other
Installs winner
NXV43 Elegant Watch Face wins
+30% vs other
MAU winner
NXV43 Elegant Watch Face wins
+19% vs other
Rating winner
Digital RetroFlip Watch face wins
+40% vs other
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Digital RetroFlip Watch face
vs
NXV43 Elegant Watch Face
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$100
▶
$138
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.2K
▶
$1.7K
Lifetime installs (est.)
6K
▶
7K
Monthly active users (est.)?
613.69
▶
732.755
App Store rating
3.74★
◀
2.67★
Total ratings
112
◀
57
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Personalization
- Price
- USD1.49
- Released
- Apr 3, 2024
- Last updated
- Dec 1, 2025
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Personalization
- Price
- USD1.59
- Released
- Dec 18, 2021
- Last updated
- Sep 20, 2025
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
Digital RetroFlip Watch face trajectory
NXV43 Elegant Watch Face trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Digital RetroFlip Watch face or NXV43 Elegant Watch Face? v
NXV43 Elegant Watch Face earns about $138 per month, while Digital RetroFlip Watch face earns about $100. That is a 1.4× revenue gap (~$38 more per month for NXV43 Elegant Watch Face). Annual revenue: Digital RetroFlip Watch face ≈ $1.2K/year, NXV43 Elegant Watch Face ≈ $1.7K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Digital RetroFlip Watch face or NXV43 Elegant Watch Face? v
NXV43 Elegant Watch Face leads with about 7K estimated downloads vs 6K for Digital RetroFlip Watch face - a 1.3× gap. Digital RetroFlip Watch face reports 5,000+ installs on Google Play. NXV43 Elegant Watch Face reports 5,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Digital RetroFlip Watch face and NXV43 Elegant Watch Face in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Personalization category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do Digital RetroFlip Watch face and NXV43 Elegant Watch Face have in-app purchases? v
Digital RetroFlip Watch face does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. NXV43 Elegant Watch Face does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Digital RetroFlip Watch face runs "Paid app ($1.49)", NXV43 Elegant Watch Face runs "Paid app ($1.59)".
Which has better ratings, Digital RetroFlip Watch face or NXV43 Elegant Watch Face? v
Digital RetroFlip Watch face edges ahead with ★ 3.7 vs ★ 2.7 (gap of 1.1 stars). Rating volume: Digital RetroFlip Watch face 3 ratings, NXV43 Elegant Watch Face 22 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Digital RetroFlip Watch face vs NXV43 Elegant Watch Face revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $100 for Digital RetroFlip Watch face and $138 for NXV43 Elegant Watch Face are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Personalization) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Digital RetroFlip Watch face or NXV43 Elegant Watch Face to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.