Dolce Gusto Touch Timer vs Slow Cooker Central

Dolce Gusto Touch Timer

dtylam
Google Play
$324/mo
~$3.9K/yr · 14K installs
VS

Slow Cooker Central

Slow Cooker Central Pty Ltd
Google Play
$66/mo
~$787/yr · 2K installs
Revenue winner Dolce Gusto Touch Timer wins +391% vs other
Installs winner Dolce Gusto Touch Timer wins +809% vs other
MAU winner Dolce Gusto Touch Timer wins +972% vs other
Rating winnerTied

Why Dolce Gusto Touch Timer is winning

Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Dolce Gusto Touch Timer earns roughly 5× more per month than Slow Cooker Central - $324 vs $66.
  2. Bigger install base. Dolce Gusto Touch Timer has ~14K lifetime installs vs Slow Cooker Central's ~2K - 9.1× the funnel top.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Dolce Gusto Touch Timer report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Dolce Gusto Touch Timer
vs
Slow Cooker Central
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$324
$66
Annual revenue (est.)
$3.9K
$787
Lifetime installs (est.)
14K
2K
Monthly active users (est.)?
2K
148.675
App Store rating
-
=
-
Total ratings
0
=
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers

Dolce Gusto Touch Timer

dtylam
Google Play
Category
Food & Drink
Price
USD1.9
Released
Feb 17, 2017
Last updated
Apr 16, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
1.5.4
Languages
-
View full Dolce Gusto Touch Timer report →

Slow Cooker Central

Slow Cooker Central Pty Ltd
Google Play
Category
Food & Drink
Price
USD3.49
Released
May 29, 2023
Last updated
Apr 14, 2025
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
1.0.0
Languages
-
View full Slow Cooker Central report →

Dolce Gusto Touch Timer trajectory

JulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Slow Cooker Central trajectory

JulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

FAQ

Which makes more money, Dolce Gusto Touch Timer or Slow Cooker Central? v
Dolce Gusto Touch Timer earns about $324 per month, while Slow Cooker Central earns about $66. That is a 4.9× revenue gap (~$258 more per month for Dolce Gusto Touch Timer). Annual revenue: Dolce Gusto Touch Timer ≈ $3.9K/year, Slow Cooker Central ≈ $787/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Dolce Gusto Touch Timer or Slow Cooker Central? v
Dolce Gusto Touch Timer leads with about 14K estimated downloads vs 2K for Slow Cooker Central - a 9.1× gap. Dolce Gusto Touch Timer reports 10,000+ installs on Google Play. Slow Cooker Central reports 1,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Dolce Gusto Touch Timer and Slow Cooker Central in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do Dolce Gusto Touch Timer and Slow Cooker Central have in-app purchases? v
Dolce Gusto Touch Timer does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Slow Cooker Central does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Dolce Gusto Touch Timer runs "Paid app ($1.90)", Slow Cooker Central runs "Paid app ($3.49)".
How accurate are these Dolce Gusto Touch Timer vs Slow Cooker Central revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $324 for Dolce Gusto Touch Timer and $66 for Slow Cooker Central are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Dolce Gusto Touch Timer or Slow Cooker Central to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.