E・レシピ ‐ プロの献立レシピを毎日お届け vs Fussy Toddler Recipes
E・レシピ ‐ プロの献立レシピを毎日お届け
Excite Japan Co.,Ltd.
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 2K installs
VS
Fussy Toddler Recipes
Natalie Peall
App Store
$53/mo
~$639/yr · 400 installs
Revenue winner
Fussy Toddler Recipes wins
+5300% vs other
Installs winner
E・レシピ ‐ プロの献立レシピを毎日お届け wins
+513% vs other
MAU winner
E・レシピ ‐ プロの献立レシピを毎日お届け wins
+557% vs other
Rating winner
E・レシピ ‐ プロの献立レシピを毎日お届け wins
+27% vs other
Why Fussy Toddler Recipes is winning
Top 1 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Fussy Toddler Recipes earns roughly 53× more per month than E・レシピ ‐ プロの献立レシピを毎日お届け - $53 vs $0.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fussy Toddler Recipes report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
E・レシピ ‐ プロの献立レシピを毎日お届け
vs
Fussy Toddler Recipes
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$53
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$639
Lifetime installs (est.)
2K
◀
400
Monthly active users (est.)?
291.55
◀
44.4
App Store rating
4.82★
◀
3.80★
Total ratings
49
◀
5
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Nov 18, 2015
- Last updated
- Feb 21, 2026
- File size
- 56.3 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 4.0.22
- Languages
- Japanese
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- USD4.99
- Released
- May 16, 2017
- Last updated
- Jan 25, 2026
- File size
- 84.7 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.0.6
- Languages
- English
E・レシピ ‐ プロの献立レシピを毎日お届け trajectory
Fussy Toddler Recipes trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, E・レシピ ‐ プロの献立レシピを毎日お届け or Fussy Toddler Recipes? v
Fussy Toddler Recipes earns about $53 per month, while E・レシピ ‐ プロの献立レシピを毎日お届け earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$53 more per month for Fussy Toddler Recipes). Annual revenue: E・レシピ ‐ プロの献立レシピを毎日お届け ≈ $0/year, Fussy Toddler Recipes ≈ $639/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, E・レシピ ‐ プロの献立レシピを毎日お届け or Fussy Toddler Recipes? v
E・レシピ ‐ プロの献立レシピを毎日お届け leads with about 2K estimated downloads vs 400 for Fussy Toddler Recipes - a 6.1× gap. E・レシピ ‐ プロの献立レシピを毎日お届け's App Store downloads are estimated from 49 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Fussy Toddler Recipes's App Store downloads are estimated from 5 ratings.
Are E・レシピ ‐ プロの献立レシピを毎日お届け and Fussy Toddler Recipes in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do E・レシピ ‐ プロの献立レシピを毎日お届け and Fussy Toddler Recipes have in-app purchases? v
E・レシピ ‐ プロの献立レシピを毎日お届け does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Fussy Toddler Recipes does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: E・レシピ ‐ プロの献立レシピを毎日お届け runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)", Fussy Toddler Recipes runs "Paid app ($4.99)".
Which has better ratings, E・レシピ ‐ プロの献立レシピを毎日お届け or Fussy Toddler Recipes? v
E・レシピ ‐ プロの献立レシピを毎日お届け edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 3.8 (gap of 1.0 stars). Rating volume: E・レシピ ‐ プロの献立レシピを毎日お届け 49 ratings, Fussy Toddler Recipes 5 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these E・レシピ ‐ プロの献立レシピを毎日お届け vs Fussy Toddler Recipes revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for E・レシピ ‐ プロの献立レシピを毎日お届け and $53 for Fussy Toddler Recipes are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare E・レシピ ‐ プロの献立レシピを毎日お届け or Fussy Toddler Recipes to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.