EasyReclaim vs Photo Recovery&File Restorer

Photo Recovery&File Restorer earns about $0 per month, while EasyReclaim earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap. Annual revenue: EasyReclaim ≈ $0/year, Photo Recovery&File Restorer ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.

Photo Recovery&File Restorer leads with about 1.3M estimated downloads vs 38K for EasyReclaim - a 34.1× gap. EasyReclaim reports 10,000+ installs on Google Play. Photo Recovery&File Restorer reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play.

Yes - both apps sit in the Tools category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.

EasyReclaim does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Photo Recovery&File Restorer does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: EasyReclaim runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)", Photo Recovery&File Restorer runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)".

Photo Recovery&File Restorer edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.2 stars). Rating volume: EasyReclaim 0 ratings, Photo Recovery&File Restorer 7 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.

Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for EasyReclaim and $0 for Photo Recovery&File Restorer are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Tools) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.

Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.