EAT CLUB - Rezepte & Kochen vs SlushIQ

EAT CLUB - Rezepte & Kochen earns about $7.0K per month, while SlushIQ earns about $9. That is a 780.1× revenue gap (~$7.0K more per month for EAT CLUB - Rezepte & Kochen). Annual revenue: EAT CLUB - Rezepte & Kochen ≈ $84.2K/year, SlushIQ ≈ $109/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.

EAT CLUB - Rezepte & Kochen leads with about 423K estimated downloads vs 379 for SlushIQ - a 1115.9× gap. EAT CLUB - Rezepte & Kochen reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play. SlushIQ reports 100+ installs on Google Play.

Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.

EAT CLUB - Rezepte & Kochen: IAP range $1.99 - $31.99 per item. SlushIQ: no IAP detected on the public listing. EAT CLUB - Rezepte & Kochen runs a "Subscription (~$7.98/mo)" monetization model; SlushIQ runs "Paid app ($1.99)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.

SlushIQ edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 5.0 stars). Rating volume: EAT CLUB - Rezepte & Kochen 0 ratings, SlushIQ 6 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.

Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $7.0K for EAT CLUB - Rezepte & Kochen and $9 for SlushIQ are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.

Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.