EAT SMARTER - US vs Too Good To Go: Save Good Food

EAT SMARTER - US

EAT SMARTER GmbH & Co. KG
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 400 installs
VS

Too Good To Go: Save Good Food

Too Good To Go
App Store
$3.04M/mo
~$36.52M/yr · 79.9M installs
Revenue winner Too Good To Go: Save Good Food wins +304348200% vs other
Installs winner Too Good To Go: Save Good Food wins +19981175% vs other
MAU winner Too Good To Go: Save Good Food wins +13408387% vs other
Rating winner Too Good To Go: Save Good Food wins +7% vs other

Why Too Good To Go: Save Good Food is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Too Good To Go: Save Good Food earns roughly 3043482× more per month than EAT SMARTER - US - $3.04M vs $0.
  2. Subscription model. Too Good To Go: Save Good Food runs a $10.00/mo subscription that compounds; EAT SMARTER - US relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
  3. Bigger install base. Too Good To Go: Save Good Food has ~79.9M lifetime installs vs EAT SMARTER - US's ~400 - 199812.8× the funnel top.
  4. Better app store reviews. Too Good To Go: Save Good Food sits at 4.93★ vs 4.60★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.

→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Too Good To Go: Save Good Food report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

EAT SMARTER - US
vs
Too Good To Go: Save Good Food
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$3.04M
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$36.52M
Lifetime installs (est.)
400
▶
79.9M
Monthly active users (est.)?
30.4
▶
4.1M
App Store rating
4.60★
▶
4.93★
Total ratings
5
▶
533K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$10.00
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers

EAT SMARTER - US

EAT SMARTER GmbH & Co. KG
App Store
Category
Food & Drink
Price
Free
Released
Nov 22, 2023
Last updated
Mar 20, 2024
File size
21.6 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
3.2.9
Languages
English
View full EAT SMARTER - US report →

Too Good To Go: Save Good Food

Too Good To Go
App Store
Category
Food & Drink
Price
Free
Released
Dec 8, 2015
Last updated
Jul 1, 2026
File size
196.7 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
26.6.21
Languages
EU, Catalan, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English +10 more
View full Too Good To Go: Save Good Food report →

EAT SMARTER - US trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

Too Good To Go: Save Good Food trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

Related app pages

EAT SMARTER - US App Store page →Too Good To Go: Save Good Food App Store page →

Related comparisons

Eat Smarter iOS vs Fussy Toddler Recipes iOSAllergy Food Scanner Ryla iOS vs Eat Smarter iOSEat Smarter iOS vs Meal Planner Amp Grocery List AndroidEat Smarter iOS vs Love Manuela iOSDoordash Food Grocery More iOS vs Eat Smarter iOS7 Eleven Rewards Shopping iOS vs Eat Smarter iOS

Compare another pair

FAQ

Which makes more money, EAT SMARTER - US or Too Good To Go: Save Good Food? v
Too Good To Go: Save Good Food earns about $3.04M per month, while EAT SMARTER - US earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$3.04M more per month for Too Good To Go: Save Good Food). Annual revenue: EAT SMARTER - US ≈ $0/year, Too Good To Go: Save Good Food ≈ $36.52M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, EAT SMARTER - US or Too Good To Go: Save Good Food? v
Too Good To Go: Save Good Food leads with about 79.9M estimated downloads vs 400 for EAT SMARTER - US - a 199812.8× gap. EAT SMARTER - US's App Store downloads are estimated from 5 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Too Good To Go: Save Good Food's App Store downloads are estimated from 533K ratings.
Are EAT SMARTER - US and Too Good To Go: Save Good Food in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do EAT SMARTER - US and Too Good To Go: Save Good Food have in-app purchases? v
EAT SMARTER - US does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Too Good To Go: Save Good Food does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: EAT SMARTER - US runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)", Too Good To Go: Save Good Food runs "Subscription (~$10.00/mo, security)".
Which has better ratings, EAT SMARTER - US or Too Good To Go: Save Good Food? v
Too Good To Go: Save Good Food edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: EAT SMARTER - US 5 ratings, Too Good To Go: Save Good Food 533K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these EAT SMARTER - US vs Too Good To Go: Save Good Food revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for EAT SMARTER - US and $3.04M for Too Good To Go: Save Good Food are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare EAT SMARTER - US or Too Good To Go: Save Good Food to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.