EAT SMARTER - US vs Robert Parker
EAT SMARTER - US
EAT SMARTER GmbH & Co. KG
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 400 installs
VS
Robert Parker
Tablet Inc
App Store
$31/mo
~$370/yr · 650 installs
Revenue winner
Robert Parker wins
+3100% vs other
Installs winner
Robert Parker wins
+63% vs other
MAU winner
Robert Parker wins
+110% vs other
Rating winner
EAT SMARTER - US wins
+99% vs other
Why Robert Parker is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Robert Parker earns roughly 31× more per month than EAT SMARTER - US - $31 vs $0.
- Subscription model. Robert Parker runs a $14.99/mo subscription that compounds; EAT SMARTER - US relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Robert Parker has ~650 lifetime installs vs EAT SMARTER - US's ~400 - 1.6× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Robert Parker report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
EAT SMARTER - US
vs
Robert Parker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$31
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$370
Lifetime installs (est.)
400
▶
650
Monthly active users (est.)?
30.4
▶
63.7
App Store rating
4.60★
◀
2.31★
Total ratings
5
▶
13
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$14.99
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
▶
1 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Nov 22, 2023
- Last updated
- Mar 20, 2024
- File size
- 21.6 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 3.2.9
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 3, 2013
- Last updated
- May 4, 2026
- File size
- 24.7 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 3.1.0
- Languages
- English
EAT SMARTER - US trajectory
Robert Parker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, EAT SMARTER - US or Robert Parker? v
Robert Parker earns about $31 per month, while EAT SMARTER - US earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$31 more per month for Robert Parker). Annual revenue: EAT SMARTER - US ≈ $0/year, Robert Parker ≈ $370/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, EAT SMARTER - US or Robert Parker? v
Robert Parker leads with about 650 estimated downloads vs 400 for EAT SMARTER - US - a 1.6× gap. EAT SMARTER - US's App Store downloads are estimated from 5 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Robert Parker's App Store downloads are estimated from 13 ratings.
Are EAT SMARTER - US and Robert Parker in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do EAT SMARTER - US and Robert Parker offer? v
EAT SMARTER - US: no IAP detected on the public listing. Robert Parker: IAP range 1 tiers detected. EAT SMARTER - US runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; Robert Parker runs "Subscription (~$14.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, EAT SMARTER - US or Robert Parker? v
EAT SMARTER - US edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 2.3 (gap of 2.3 stars). Rating volume: EAT SMARTER - US 5 ratings, Robert Parker 13 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these EAT SMARTER - US vs Robert Parker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for EAT SMARTER - US and $31 for Robert Parker are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare EAT SMARTER - US or Robert Parker to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.