EseeCloud(IP Pro, VR Cam) vs FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer
EseeCloud(IP Pro, VR Cam)
Guangdong Juan Intelligent Technology Joint Stock Co., Ltd
App Store
$23.8K/mo
~$285.5K/yr · 442K installs
VS
FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer
FUJIFILM Corporation
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 800 installs
Revenue winner
EseeCloud(IP Pro, VR Cam) wins
+2379200% vs other
Installs winner
EseeCloud(IP Pro, VR Cam) wins
+55160% vs other
MAU winner
EseeCloud(IP Pro, VR Cam) wins
+63481% vs other
Rating winner
EseeCloud(IP Pro, VR Cam) wins
+79% vs other
Why EseeCloud(IP Pro, VR Cam) is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- EseeCloud(IP Pro, VR Cam) earns roughly 23792× more per month than FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer - $23.8K vs $0.
- Subscription model. EseeCloud(IP Pro, VR Cam) runs a $5.59/mo subscription that compounds; FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. EseeCloud(IP Pro, VR Cam) has ~442K lifetime installs vs FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer's ~800 - 552.6× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. EseeCloud(IP Pro, VR Cam) runs 9 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full EseeCloud(IP Pro, VR Cam) report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
EseeCloud(IP Pro, VR Cam)
vs
FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$23.8K
◀
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$285.5K
◀
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
442K
◀
800
Monthly active users (est.)?
132K
◀
207.2
App Store rating
3.91★
◀
2.19★
Total ratings
6K
◀
16
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$5.59
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
9 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Sep 1, 2015
- Last updated
- Jun 29, 2026
- File size
- 552.2 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 4.11.0
- Languages
- Arabic, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish +20 more
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Mar 12, 2015
- Last updated
- Mar 4, 2026
- File size
- 9.3 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.3.13
- Languages
- English, Japanese
EseeCloud(IP Pro, VR Cam) trajectory
FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, EseeCloud(IP Pro, VR Cam) or FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer? v
EseeCloud(IP Pro, VR Cam) earns about $23.8K per month, while FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$23.8K more per month for EseeCloud(IP Pro, VR Cam)). Annual revenue: EseeCloud(IP Pro, VR Cam) ≈ $285.5K/year, FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, EseeCloud(IP Pro, VR Cam) or FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer? v
EseeCloud(IP Pro, VR Cam) leads with about 442K estimated downloads vs 800 for FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer - a 552.6× gap. EseeCloud(IP Pro, VR Cam)'s App Store downloads are estimated from 6K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer's App Store downloads are estimated from 16 ratings.
Are EseeCloud(IP Pro, VR Cam) and FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photo & Video category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do EseeCloud(IP Pro, VR Cam) and FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer offer? v
EseeCloud(IP Pro, VR Cam): IAP range 9 tiers detected. FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer: no IAP detected on the public listing. EseeCloud(IP Pro, VR Cam) runs a "Subscription (~$5.59/mo)" monetization model; FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, EseeCloud(IP Pro, VR Cam) or FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer? v
EseeCloud(IP Pro, VR Cam) edges ahead with ★ 3.9 vs ★ 2.2 (gap of 1.7 stars). Rating volume: EseeCloud(IP Pro, VR Cam) 6K ratings, FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer 16 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these EseeCloud(IP Pro, VR Cam) vs FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $23.8K for EseeCloud(IP Pro, VR Cam) and $0 for FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photo & Video) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare EseeCloud(IP Pro, VR Cam) or FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.