essen & trinken Magazin vs Fork Ranger - sustainable food
essen & trinken Magazin
Landwirtschaftsverlag GmbH
App Store
$27/mo
~$322/yr · 400 installs
VS
Fork Ranger - sustainable food
Fork Ranger
App Store
$64/mo
~$766/yr · 3K installs
Revenue winner
Fork Ranger - sustainable food wins
+137% vs other
Installs winner
Fork Ranger - sustainable food wins
+725% vs other
MAU winner
Fork Ranger - sustainable food wins
+852% vs other
Rating winner
Fork Ranger - sustainable food wins
+63% vs other
Why Fork Ranger - sustainable food is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Fork Ranger - sustainable food earns roughly 2× more per month than essen & trinken Magazin - $64 vs $27.
- Aggressive pricing. Fork Ranger - sustainable food undercuts at $3.00/mo vs $19.99/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Fork Ranger - sustainable food has ~3K lifetime installs vs essen & trinken Magazin's ~400 - 8.3× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Fork Ranger - sustainable food sits at 4.88★ vs 3.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fork Ranger - sustainable food report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
essen & trinken Magazin
vs
Fork Ranger - sustainable food
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$27
▶
$64
Annual revenue (est.)
$322
▶
$766
Lifetime installs (est.)
400
▶
3K
Monthly active users (est.)?
41.6
▶
396
App Store rating
3.00★
▶
4.88★
Total ratings
3
▶
66
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$19.99
◀
$3.00
IAP tiers detected
10 tiers
◀
4 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 4, 2016
- Last updated
- Jul 14, 2025
- File size
- 163.0 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 5.2.0
- Languages
- Danish, Dutch, English, French, German, Italian +3 more
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Mar 16, 2021
- Last updated
- Jul 2, 2026
- File size
- 34.8 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 9.7
- Languages
- Dutch, English, German
essen & trinken Magazin trajectory
Fork Ranger - sustainable food trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, essen & trinken Magazin or Fork Ranger - sustainable food? v
Fork Ranger - sustainable food earns about $64 per month, while essen & trinken Magazin earns about $27. That is a 2.4× revenue gap (~$37 more per month for Fork Ranger - sustainable food). Annual revenue: essen & trinken Magazin ≈ $322/year, Fork Ranger - sustainable food ≈ $766/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, essen & trinken Magazin or Fork Ranger - sustainable food? v
Fork Ranger - sustainable food leads with about 3K estimated downloads vs 400 for essen & trinken Magazin - a 8.3× gap. essen & trinken Magazin's App Store downloads are estimated from 3 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Fork Ranger - sustainable food's App Store downloads are estimated from 66 ratings.
Are essen & trinken Magazin and Fork Ranger - sustainable food in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do essen & trinken Magazin and Fork Ranger - sustainable food offer? v
essen & trinken Magazin: IAP range 10 tiers detected. Fork Ranger - sustainable food: IAP range 4 tiers detected. essen & trinken Magazin runs a "Subscription (~$19.99/mo)" monetization model; Fork Ranger - sustainable food runs "Subscription (~$5.00/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, essen & trinken Magazin or Fork Ranger - sustainable food? v
Fork Ranger - sustainable food edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 3.0 (gap of 1.9 stars). Rating volume: essen & trinken Magazin 3 ratings, Fork Ranger - sustainable food 66 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these essen & trinken Magazin vs Fork Ranger - sustainable food revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $27 for essen & trinken Magazin and $64 for Fork Ranger - sustainable food are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare essen & trinken Magazin or Fork Ranger - sustainable food to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.