essen & trinken Magazin vs inKind
essen & trinken Magazin
Landwirtschaftsverlag GmbH
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 400 installs
VS
inKind
inKind
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 798K installs
Revenue winnerTied
Installs winner
inKind wins
+199328% vs other
MAU winner
inKind wins
+172482% vs other
Rating winner
inKind wins
+62% vs other
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
essen & trinken Magazin
vs
inKind
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
=
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
=
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
400
▶
798K
Monthly active users (est.)?
41.6
▶
72K
App Store rating
3.00★
▶
4.87★
Total ratings
3
▶
13K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 4, 2016
- Last updated
- Jul 14, 2025
- File size
- 163.0 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 5.2.0
- Languages
- Danish, Dutch, English, French, German, Italian +3 more
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Aug 13, 2018
- Last updated
- May 13, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 6.51.0
- Languages
- -
essen & trinken Magazin trajectory
inKind trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, essen & trinken Magazin or inKind? v
inKind earns about $0 per month, while essen & trinken Magazin earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap. Annual revenue: essen & trinken Magazin ≈ $0/year, inKind ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, essen & trinken Magazin or inKind? v
inKind leads with about 798K estimated downloads vs 400 for essen & trinken Magazin - a 1994.3× gap. essen & trinken Magazin's App Store downloads are estimated from 3 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. inKind reports 500,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are essen & trinken Magazin and inKind in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do essen & trinken Magazin and inKind have in-app purchases? v
essen & trinken Magazin does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. inKind does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: essen & trinken Magazin runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)", inKind runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)".
Which has better ratings, essen & trinken Magazin or inKind? v
inKind edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 3.0 (gap of 1.9 stars). Rating volume: essen & trinken Magazin 3 ratings, inKind 1K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these essen & trinken Magazin vs inKind revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for essen & trinken Magazin and $0 for inKind are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare essen & trinken Magazin or inKind to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.