essen & trinken Magazin vs Samsung Food: Meal Planner
essen & trinken Magazin
Landwirtschaftsverlag GmbH
App Store
$27/mo
~$322/yr · 400 installs
VS
Samsung Food: Meal Planner
Whisk food
App Store
$13.3K/mo
~$159.2K/yr · 494K installs
Revenue winner
Samsung Food: Meal Planner wins
+49026% vs other
Installs winner
Samsung Food: Meal Planner wins
+123440% vs other
MAU winner
Samsung Food: Meal Planner wins
+141258% vs other
Rating winner
Samsung Food: Meal Planner wins
+59% vs other
Why Samsung Food: Meal Planner is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Samsung Food: Meal Planner earns roughly 491× more per month than essen & trinken Magazin - $13.3K vs $27.
- Aggressive pricing. Samsung Food: Meal Planner undercuts at $6.99/mo vs $19.99/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Samsung Food: Meal Planner has ~494K lifetime installs vs essen & trinken Magazin's ~400 - 1235.4× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Samsung Food: Meal Planner sits at 4.78★ vs 3.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Samsung Food: Meal Planner report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
essen & trinken Magazin
vs
Samsung Food: Meal Planner
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$27
▶
$13.3K
Annual revenue (est.)
$322
▶
$159.2K
Lifetime installs (est.)
400
▶
494K
Monthly active users (est.)?
41.6
▶
59K
App Store rating
3.00★
▶
4.78★
Total ratings
3
▶
6K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$19.99
◀
$6.99
IAP tiers detected
10 tiers
◀
2 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 4, 2016
- Last updated
- Jul 14, 2025
- File size
- 163.0 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 5.2.0
- Languages
- Danish, Dutch, English, French, German, Italian +3 more
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 15, 2016
- Last updated
- May 11, 2026
- File size
- 164.5 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 5.56.0
- Languages
- English, French, German, Italian, Korean, Portuguese +1 more
essen & trinken Magazin trajectory
Samsung Food: Meal Planner trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, essen & trinken Magazin or Samsung Food: Meal Planner? v
Samsung Food: Meal Planner earns about $13.3K per month, while essen & trinken Magazin earns about $27. That is a 491.3× revenue gap (~$13.2K more per month for Samsung Food: Meal Planner). Annual revenue: essen & trinken Magazin ≈ $322/year, Samsung Food: Meal Planner ≈ $159.2K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, essen & trinken Magazin or Samsung Food: Meal Planner? v
Samsung Food: Meal Planner leads with about 494K estimated downloads vs 400 for essen & trinken Magazin - a 1235.4× gap. essen & trinken Magazin's App Store downloads are estimated from 3 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Samsung Food: Meal Planner's App Store downloads are estimated from 6K ratings.
Are essen & trinken Magazin and Samsung Food: Meal Planner in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do essen & trinken Magazin and Samsung Food: Meal Planner offer? v
essen & trinken Magazin: IAP range 10 tiers detected. Samsung Food: Meal Planner: IAP range 2 tiers detected. essen & trinken Magazin runs a "Subscription (~$19.99/mo)" monetization model; Samsung Food: Meal Planner runs "Subscription (~$6.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, essen & trinken Magazin or Samsung Food: Meal Planner? v
Samsung Food: Meal Planner edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 3.0 (gap of 1.8 stars). Rating volume: essen & trinken Magazin 3 ratings, Samsung Food: Meal Planner 6K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these essen & trinken Magazin vs Samsung Food: Meal Planner revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $27 for essen & trinken Magazin and $13.3K for Samsung Food: Meal Planner are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare essen & trinken Magazin or Samsung Food: Meal Planner to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.