FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter vs GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam
FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter
Lyrebird Studio
App Store
$325.2K/mo
~$3.90M/yr · 5.5M installs
VS
GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam
Noahproject Inc.
App Store
$11/mo
~$127/yr · 400 installs
Revenue winner
FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter wins
+2956500% vs other
Installs winner
FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter wins
+1377430% vs other
MAU winner
FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter wins
+1334782% vs other
Rating winner
GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam wins
+9% vs other
Why FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter earns roughly 29566× more per month than GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam - $325.2K vs $11.
- Subscription model. FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter runs a $13.99/mo subscription that compounds; GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter has ~5.5M lifetime installs vs GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam's ~400 - 13775.3× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter runs 7 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter
vs
GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$325.2K
◀
$11
Annual revenue (est.)
$3.90M
◀
$127
Lifetime installs (est.)
5.5M
◀
400
Monthly active users (est.)?
1.7M
◀
129.2
App Store rating
4.58★
▶
5.00★
Total ratings
50K
◀
7
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$13.99
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
7 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Nov 13, 2020
- Last updated
- Jun 25, 2026
- File size
- 132.4 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 5.3.1
- Languages
- Arabic, English, French, German, Hebrew, Hindi +10 more
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- USD0.99
- Released
- Dec 1, 2025
- Last updated
- Jun 27, 2026
- File size
- 59.7 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.4.1
- Languages
- English, Japanese, Korean, Chinese, Chinese
FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter trajectory
GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter or GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam? v
FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter earns about $325.2K per month, while GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam earns about $11. That is a 29566.0× revenue gap (~$325.2K more per month for FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter). Annual revenue: FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter ≈ $3.90M/year, GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam ≈ $127/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter or GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam? v
FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter leads with about 5.5M estimated downloads vs 400 for GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam - a 13775.3× gap. FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter's App Store downloads are estimated from 50K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam's App Store downloads are estimated from 7 ratings.
Are FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter and GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photo & Video category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter and GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam offer? v
FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter: IAP range 7 tiers detected. GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam: no IAP detected on the public listing. FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter runs a "Subscription (~$5.83/mo)" monetization model; GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam runs "Paid app ($0.99)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter or GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam? v
GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam edges ahead with ★ 5.0 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.4 stars). Rating volume: FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter 50K ratings, GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam 7 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter vs GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $325.2K for FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter and $11 for GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photo & Video) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter or GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.