Falling Fruit vs Transcend Theory

Transcend Theory earns about $1.3K per month, while Falling Fruit earns about $147. That is a 8.9× revenue gap (~$1.2K more per month for Transcend Theory). Annual revenue: Falling Fruit ≈ $1.8K/year, Transcend Theory ≈ $15.8K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.

Transcend Theory leads with about 8K estimated downloads vs 6K for Falling Fruit - a 1.5× gap. Falling Fruit's App Store downloads are estimated from 111 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Transcend Theory reports 5,000+ installs on Google Play.

Yes - both apps sit in the Lifestyle category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.

Falling Fruit does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Transcend Theory does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Falling Fruit runs "Paid app ($0.99)", Transcend Theory runs "Paid app ($12.99)".

Transcend Theory edges ahead with ★ 3.6 vs ★ 2.4 (gap of 1.2 stars). Rating volume: Falling Fruit 111 ratings, Transcend Theory 90 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.

Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $147 for Falling Fruit and $1.3K for Transcend Theory are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Lifestyle) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.

Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.