Famileo: Your family newspaper vs PhotoPills

Famileo: Your family newspaper earns about $91.7K per month, while PhotoPills earns about $56.2K. That is a 1.6× revenue gap (~$35.6K more per month for Famileo: Your family newspaper). Annual revenue: Famileo: Your family newspaper ≈ $1.10M/year, PhotoPills ≈ $674.2K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.

Famileo: Your family newspaper leads with about 1.5M estimated downloads vs 426K for PhotoPills - a 3.4× gap. Famileo: Your family newspaper reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. PhotoPills reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.

Yes - both apps sit in the Photography category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.

Famileo: Your family newspaper does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. PhotoPills does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Famileo: Your family newspaper runs "Subscription (~$9.99/mo)", PhotoPills runs "Paid app ($10.99)".

Famileo: Your family newspaper edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.8 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: Famileo: Your family newspaper 27 ratings, PhotoPills 512 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.

Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $91.7K for Famileo: Your family newspaper and $56.2K for PhotoPills are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photography) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.

Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.