FAN2FAN vs ESPN
FAN2FAN
Michalis Mallios
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 2K installs
VS
ESPN
Disney
Google Play
$710.7K/mo
~$8.53M/yr · 106.5M installs
Revenue winner
ESPN wins
+71066000% vs other
Installs winner
ESPN wins
+7097352% vs other
MAU winner
ESPN wins
+1013822% vs other
Rating winner
ESPN wins
+437% vs other
Why ESPN is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- ESPN earns roughly 710660× more per month than FAN2FAN - $710.7K vs $0.
- Subscription model. ESPN runs a $19.98/mo subscription that compounds; FAN2FAN relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. ESPN has ~106.5M lifetime installs vs FAN2FAN's ~2K - 70974.5× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. ESPN sits at 4.37★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
FAN2FAN
vs
ESPN
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$710.7K
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$8.53M
Lifetime installs (est.)
2K
▶
106.5M
Monthly active users (est.)?
168
▶
1.7M
App Store rating
-
▶
4.37★
Total ratings
0
▶
1.2M
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$19.98
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Sports
- Price
- Free
- Released
- May 7, 2026
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- 4.3 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.2
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Sports
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 15, 2010
- Last updated
- May 4, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone 10+
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
FAN2FAN trajectory
ESPN trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, FAN2FAN or ESPN? v
ESPN earns about $710.7K per month, while FAN2FAN earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$710.7K more per month for ESPN). Annual revenue: FAN2FAN ≈ $0/year, ESPN ≈ $8.53M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, FAN2FAN or ESPN? v
ESPN leads with about 106.5M estimated downloads vs 2K for FAN2FAN - a 70974.5× gap. FAN2FAN's App Store downloads are estimated from 0 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. ESPN reports 100,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are FAN2FAN and ESPN in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Sports category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do FAN2FAN and ESPN offer? v
FAN2FAN: no IAP detected on the public listing. ESPN: IAP range $4.99 - $79.99 per item. FAN2FAN runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; ESPN runs "Subscription (~$19.98/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, FAN2FAN or ESPN? v
ESPN edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.4 stars). Rating volume: FAN2FAN 0 ratings, ESPN 199K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these FAN2FAN vs ESPN revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for FAN2FAN and $710.7K for ESPN are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Sports) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare FAN2FAN or ESPN to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.