Fasting Tracker App vs inKind
Fasting Tracker App
Drama Labs GmbH
App Store
$833/mo
~$10.0K/yr · 34K installs
VS
inKind
inKind
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 790K installs
Revenue winner
Fasting Tracker App wins
+83300% vs other
Installs winner
inKind wins
+2247% vs other
MAU winner
inKind wins
+2644% vs other
Rating winner
inKind wins
+4% vs other
Why Fasting Tracker App is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Fasting Tracker App earns roughly 833× more per month than inKind - $833 vs $0.
- Subscription model. Fasting Tracker App runs a $9.99/mo subscription that compounds; inKind relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- More monetization surfaces. Fasting Tracker App runs 3 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fasting Tracker App report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Fasting Tracker App
vs
inKind
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$833
◀
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$10.0K
◀
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
34K
▶
790K
Monthly active users (est.)?
3K
▶
71K
App Store rating
4.68★
▶
4.88★
Total ratings
673
▶
13K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.99
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
3 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 3, 2019
- Last updated
- Nov 8, 2022
- File size
- 60.2 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 4.1
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Aug 13, 2018
- Last updated
- May 8, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 6.48.0
- Languages
- -
Fasting Tracker App trajectory
inKind trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Fasting Tracker App or inKind? v
Fasting Tracker App earns about $833 per month, while inKind earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$833 more per month for Fasting Tracker App). Annual revenue: Fasting Tracker App ≈ $10.0K/year, inKind ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Fasting Tracker App or inKind? v
inKind leads with about 790K estimated downloads vs 34K for Fasting Tracker App - a 23.5× gap. Fasting Tracker App's App Store downloads are estimated from 673 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. inKind reports 500,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Fasting Tracker App and inKind in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Fasting Tracker App and inKind offer? v
Fasting Tracker App: IAP range 3 tiers detected. inKind: no IAP detected on the public listing. Fasting Tracker App runs a "Subscription (~$9.99/mo)" monetization model; inKind runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Fasting Tracker App or inKind? v
inKind edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.7 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Fasting Tracker App 673 ratings, inKind 1K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Fasting Tracker App vs inKind revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $833 for Fasting Tracker App and $0 for inKind are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Fasting Tracker App or inKind to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.