Feeding Littles: Meal Planner vs Samsung Food: Meal Planner

Feeding Littles: Meal Planner

Feeding Littles Labs, LLC
App Store
$328/mo
~$3.9K/yr · 8K installs
VS

Samsung Food: Meal Planner

Whisk food
App Store
$13.4K/mo
~$160.9K/yr · 499K installs
Revenue winner Samsung Food: Meal Planner wins +3987% vs other
Installs winner Samsung Food: Meal Planner wins +5796% vs other
MAU winner Samsung Food: Meal Planner wins +5747% vs other
Rating winner Feeding Littles: Meal Planner wins +3% vs other

Why Samsung Food: Meal Planner is winning

Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Samsung Food: Meal Planner earns roughly 41× more per month than Feeding Littles: Meal Planner - $13.4K vs $328.
  2. Aggressive pricing. Samsung Food: Meal Planner undercuts at $6.99/mo vs $9.99/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
  3. Bigger install base. Samsung Food: Meal Planner has ~499K lifetime installs vs Feeding Littles: Meal Planner's ~8K - 59.0× the funnel top.

→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Samsung Food: Meal Planner report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Feeding Littles: Meal Planner
vs
Samsung Food: Meal Planner
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$328
▶
$13.4K
Annual revenue (est.)
$3.9K
▶
$160.9K
Lifetime installs (est.)
8K
▶
499K
Monthly active users (est.)?
1K
▶
59K
App Store rating
4.94★
◀
4.78★
Total ratings
154
▶
6K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.99
◀
$6.99
IAP tiers detected
2 tiers
=
2 tiers

Feeding Littles: Meal Planner

Feeding Littles Labs, LLC
App Store
Category
Food & Drink
Price
Free
Released
Jan 4, 2026
Last updated
Jul 2, 2026
File size
43.3 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
1.3.15
Languages
English
View full Feeding Littles: Meal Planner report →

Samsung Food: Meal Planner

Whisk food
App Store
Category
Food & Drink
Price
Free
Released
Jul 15, 2016
Last updated
May 11, 2026
File size
164.5 MB
Content rating
17+
Version
5.56.0
Languages
English, French, German, Italian, Korean, Portuguese +1 more
View full Samsung Food: Meal Planner report →

Feeding Littles: Meal Planner trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

Samsung Food: Meal Planner trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

Related app pages

Feeding Littles: Meal Planner App Store page →Samsung Food: Meal Planner App Store page →

Related comparisons

Feeding Littles Meal Planner iOS vs Fussy Toddler Recipes iOSFeeding Littles Meal Planner iOS vs Kitchencost Recipe Costing iOSFeeding Littles Meal Planner iOS vs Meal Planner Amp Grocery List AndroidFeeding Littles Meal Planner iOS vs Love Manuela iOSFeeding Littles Meal Planner iOS vs Too Good to Go End Food Waste iOSDoordash Food Grocery More iOS vs Feeding Littles Meal Planner iOS

Compare another pair

FAQ

Which makes more money, Feeding Littles: Meal Planner or Samsung Food: Meal Planner? v
Samsung Food: Meal Planner earns about $13.4K per month, while Feeding Littles: Meal Planner earns about $328. That is a 40.9× revenue gap (~$13.1K more per month for Samsung Food: Meal Planner). Annual revenue: Feeding Littles: Meal Planner ≈ $3.9K/year, Samsung Food: Meal Planner ≈ $160.9K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Feeding Littles: Meal Planner or Samsung Food: Meal Planner? v
Samsung Food: Meal Planner leads with about 499K estimated downloads vs 8K for Feeding Littles: Meal Planner - a 59.0× gap. Feeding Littles: Meal Planner's App Store downloads are estimated from 154 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Samsung Food: Meal Planner's App Store downloads are estimated from 6K ratings.
Are Feeding Littles: Meal Planner and Samsung Food: Meal Planner in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Feeding Littles: Meal Planner and Samsung Food: Meal Planner offer? v
Feeding Littles: Meal Planner: IAP range 2 tiers detected. Samsung Food: Meal Planner: IAP range 2 tiers detected. Feeding Littles: Meal Planner runs a "Subscription (~$9.99/mo)" monetization model; Samsung Food: Meal Planner runs "Subscription (~$6.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Feeding Littles: Meal Planner or Samsung Food: Meal Planner? v
Feeding Littles: Meal Planner edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.8 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Feeding Littles: Meal Planner 154 ratings, Samsung Food: Meal Planner 6K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Feeding Littles: Meal Planner vs Samsung Food: Meal Planner revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $328 for Feeding Littles: Meal Planner and $13.4K for Samsung Food: Meal Planner are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Feeding Littles: Meal Planner or Samsung Food: Meal Planner to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.