FET: Kinky BDSM Dating App vs Marco Polo - Video Messenger

FET: Kinky BDSM Dating App

Ideawise Ltd.
App Store
$375.1K/mo
~$4.50M/yr · 2.4M installs
VS

Marco Polo - Video Messenger

Joya Communications
App Store
$6.78M/mo
~$81.38M/yr · 365.9M installs
Revenue winner Marco Polo - Video Messenger wins +1708% vs other
Installs winner Marco Polo - Video Messenger wins +14959% vs other
MAU winner Marco Polo - Video Messenger wins +2393% vs other
Rating winner Marco Polo - Video Messenger wins +10% vs other

Why Marco Polo - Video Messenger is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Marco Polo - Video Messenger earns roughly 18× more per month than FET: Kinky BDSM Dating App - $6.78M vs $375.1K.
  2. Premium pricing. Marco Polo - Video Messenger charges $19.99/mo vs FET: Kinky BDSM Dating App's $10.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
  3. Bigger install base. Marco Polo - Video Messenger has ~365.9M lifetime installs vs FET: Kinky BDSM Dating App's ~2.4M - 150.6× the funnel top.
  4. Better app store reviews. Marco Polo - Video Messenger sits at 4.76★ vs 4.32★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.

→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Marco Polo - Video Messenger report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

FET: Kinky BDSM Dating App
vs
Marco Polo - Video Messenger
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$375.1K
▶
$6.78M
Annual revenue (est.)
$4.50M
▶
$81.38M
Lifetime installs (est.)
2.4M
▶
365.9M
Monthly active users (est.)?
1.1M
▶
26.3M
App Store rating
4.32★
▶
4.76★
Total ratings
22K
▶
2.2M
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$10.99
▶
$19.99
IAP tiers detected
10 tiers
◀
4 tiers

FET: Kinky BDSM Dating App

Ideawise Ltd.
App Store
Category
Social Networking
Price
Free
Released
Nov 13, 2019
Last updated
Jun 29, 2026
File size
187.6 MB
Content rating
17+
Version
14.5.0
Languages
Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French +11 more
View full FET: Kinky BDSM Dating App report →

Marco Polo - Video Messenger

Joya Communications
App Store
Category
Social Networking
Price
Free
Released
Oct 7, 2014
Last updated
Jun 29, 2026
File size
216.0 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
0.1581.0
Languages
English
View full Marco Polo - Video Messenger report →

FET: Kinky BDSM Dating App trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

Marco Polo - Video Messenger trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

Related app pages

FET: Kinky BDSM Dating App App Store page →Marco Polo - Video Messenger App Store page →

Related comparisons

Fet Kinky Bdsm Dating App iOS vs Flirtini Match Chat Flirt iOSFet Kinky Bdsm Dating App iOS vs Teleguard iOSFet Kinky Bdsm Dating App iOS vs Threema the Secure Messenger iOSFet Kinky Bdsm Dating App iOS vs Threads iOSFet Kinky Bdsm Dating App iOS vs Telegram Messenger iOSFet Kinky Bdsm Dating App iOS vs Life360 Stay Connected Safe iOS

Compare another pair

FAQ

Which makes more money, FET: Kinky BDSM Dating App or Marco Polo - Video Messenger? v
Marco Polo - Video Messenger earns about $6.78M per month, while FET: Kinky BDSM Dating App earns about $375.1K. That is a 18.1× revenue gap (~$6.41M more per month for Marco Polo - Video Messenger). Annual revenue: FET: Kinky BDSM Dating App ≈ $4.50M/year, Marco Polo - Video Messenger ≈ $81.38M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, FET: Kinky BDSM Dating App or Marco Polo - Video Messenger? v
Marco Polo - Video Messenger leads with about 365.9M estimated downloads vs 2.4M for FET: Kinky BDSM Dating App - a 150.6× gap. FET: Kinky BDSM Dating App's App Store downloads are estimated from 22K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Marco Polo - Video Messenger's App Store downloads are estimated from 2.2M ratings.
Are FET: Kinky BDSM Dating App and Marco Polo - Video Messenger in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Social Networking category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do FET: Kinky BDSM Dating App and Marco Polo - Video Messenger offer? v
FET: Kinky BDSM Dating App: IAP range 10 tiers detected. Marco Polo - Video Messenger: IAP range 4 tiers detected. FET: Kinky BDSM Dating App runs a "Subscription (~$10.99/mo)" monetization model; Marco Polo - Video Messenger runs "Subscription (~$7.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, FET: Kinky BDSM Dating App or Marco Polo - Video Messenger? v
Marco Polo - Video Messenger edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.3 (gap of 0.4 stars). Rating volume: FET: Kinky BDSM Dating App 22K ratings, Marco Polo - Video Messenger 2.2M ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these FET: Kinky BDSM Dating App vs Marco Polo - Video Messenger revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $375.1K for FET: Kinky BDSM Dating App and $6.78M for Marco Polo - Video Messenger are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Social Networking) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare FET: Kinky BDSM Dating App or Marco Polo - Video Messenger to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.