Fig: Food Scanner & Guide vs Fitbit
Fig: Food Scanner & Guide
Fig - Food Is Good
Google Play
$85.6K/mo
~$1.03M/yr · 789K installs
VS
Fitbit
Google LLC
Google Play
$4.66M/mo
~$55.95M/yr · 253.3M installs
Revenue winner
Fitbit wins
+5350% vs other
Installs winner
Fitbit wins
+31988% vs other
MAU winner
Fitbit wins
+3953% vs other
Rating winner
Fig: Food Scanner & Guide wins
+8% vs other
Why Fitbit is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Fitbit earns roughly 55× more per month than Fig: Food Scanner & Guide - $4.66M vs $85.6K.
- Premium pricing. Fitbit charges $28.27/mo vs Fig: Food Scanner & Guide's $19.57/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Fitbit has ~253.3M lifetime installs vs Fig: Food Scanner & Guide's ~789K - 320.9× the funnel top.
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Fig: Food Scanner & Guide
vs
Fitbit
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$85.6K
▶
$4.66M
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.03M
▶
$55.95M
Lifetime installs (est.)
789K
▶
253.3M
Monthly active users (est.)?
150K
▶
6.1M
App Store rating
4.49★
◀
4.15★
Total ratings
7K
▶
1.3M
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$19.57
▶
$28.27
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Nov 30, 2021
- Last updated
- May 6, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 4.148.2
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Mar 16, 2012
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
Fig: Food Scanner & Guide trajectory
Fitbit trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Fig: Food Scanner & Guide or Fitbit? v
Fitbit earns about $4.66M per month, while Fig: Food Scanner & Guide earns about $85.6K. That is a 54.5× revenue gap (~$4.58M more per month for Fitbit). Annual revenue: Fig: Food Scanner & Guide ≈ $1.03M/year, Fitbit ≈ $55.95M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Fig: Food Scanner & Guide or Fitbit? v
Fitbit leads with about 253.3M estimated downloads vs 789K for Fig: Food Scanner & Guide - a 320.9× gap. Fig: Food Scanner & Guide reports 500,000+ installs on Google Play. Fitbit reports 100,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Fig: Food Scanner & Guide and Fitbit in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Fig: Food Scanner & Guide and Fitbit offer? v
Fig: Food Scanner & Guide: IAP range $4.79 - $79.99 per item. Fitbit: IAP range $7.99 - $99.99 per item. Fig: Food Scanner & Guide runs a "Subscription (~$19.57/mo)" monetization model; Fitbit runs "Subscription (~$28.27/mo, wellness)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Fig: Food Scanner & Guide or Fitbit? v
Fig: Food Scanner & Guide edges ahead with ★ 4.5 vs ★ 4.1 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: Fig: Food Scanner & Guide 2K ratings, Fitbit 245K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Fig: Food Scanner & Guide vs Fitbit revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $85.6K for Fig: Food Scanner & Guide and $4.66M for Fitbit are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Fig: Food Scanner & Guide or Fitbit to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.