Fig: Food Scanner & Guide vs MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker
Fig: Food Scanner & Guide
Fig - Food Is Good
Google Play
$85.6K/mo
~$1.03M/yr · 790K installs
VS
MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker
Adventure Labs d.o.o.
Google Play
$1.2K/mo
~$14.9K/yr · 8K installs
Revenue winner
Fig: Food Scanner & Guide wins
+6785% vs other
Installs winner
Fig: Food Scanner & Guide wins
+10406% vs other
MAU winner
Fig: Food Scanner & Guide wins
+6760% vs other
Rating winner
MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker wins
+6% vs other
Why Fig: Food Scanner & Guide is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Fig: Food Scanner & Guide earns roughly 69× more per month than MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker - $85.6K vs $1.2K.
- Premium pricing. Fig: Food Scanner & Guide charges $19.57/mo vs MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker's $7.03/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Fig: Food Scanner & Guide has ~790K lifetime installs vs MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker's ~8K - 105.1× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fig: Food Scanner & Guide report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Fig: Food Scanner & Guide
vs
MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$85.6K
◀
$1.2K
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.03M
◀
$14.9K
Lifetime installs (est.)
790K
◀
8K
Monthly active users (est.)?
150K
◀
2K
App Store rating
4.49★
▶
4.76★
Total ratings
7K
◀
406
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$19.57
◀
$7.03
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Nov 30, 2021
- Last updated
- May 6, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 4.148.2
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Sep 10, 2025
- Last updated
- Apr 1, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.3.0
- Languages
- -
Fig: Food Scanner & Guide trajectory
MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Fig: Food Scanner & Guide or MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker? v
Fig: Food Scanner & Guide earns about $85.6K per month, while MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker earns about $1.2K. That is a 68.8× revenue gap (~$84.4K more per month for Fig: Food Scanner & Guide). Annual revenue: Fig: Food Scanner & Guide ≈ $1.03M/year, MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker ≈ $14.9K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Fig: Food Scanner & Guide or MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker? v
Fig: Food Scanner & Guide leads with about 790K estimated downloads vs 8K for MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker - a 105.1× gap. Fig: Food Scanner & Guide reports 500,000+ installs on Google Play. MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker reports 5,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Fig: Food Scanner & Guide and MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Fig: Food Scanner & Guide and MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker offer? v
Fig: Food Scanner & Guide: IAP range $4.79 - $79.99 per item. MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker: IAP range $0.99 - $49.99 per item. Fig: Food Scanner & Guide runs a "Subscription (~$19.57/mo)" monetization model; MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker runs "Subscription (~$7.03/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Fig: Food Scanner & Guide or MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker? v
MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: Fig: Food Scanner & Guide 2K ratings, MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker 20 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Fig: Food Scanner & Guide vs MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $85.6K for Fig: Food Scanner & Guide and $1.2K for MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Fig: Food Scanner & Guide or MealScan: Food Calorie Tracker to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.