Fig: Food Scanner & Guide vs Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker
Fig: Food Scanner & Guide
Fig - Food Is Good
Google Play
$88.4K/mo
~$1.06M/yr · 813K installs
VS
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker
Yazio
Google Play
$4.76M/mo
~$57.06M/yr · 56.5M installs
Revenue winner
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker wins
+5279% vs other
Installs winner
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker wins
+6856% vs other
MAU winner
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker wins
+2995% vs other
Rating winner
Fig: Food Scanner & Guide wins
+3% vs other
Why Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker earns roughly 54× more per month than Fig: Food Scanner & Guide - $4.76M vs $88.4K.
- Premium pricing. Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker charges $45.79/mo vs Fig: Food Scanner & Guide's $19.57/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker has ~56.5M lifetime installs vs Fig: Food Scanner & Guide's ~813K - 69.6× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Fig: Food Scanner & Guide
vs
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$88.4K
▶
$4.76M
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.06M
▶
$57.06M
Lifetime installs (est.)
813K
▶
56.5M
Monthly active users (est.)?
155K
▶
4.8M
App Store rating
4.54★
◀
4.41★
Total ratings
8K
▶
828K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$19.57
▶
$45.79
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Nov 30, 2021
- Last updated
- Jun 24, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 4.151.2
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 23, 2014
- Last updated
- Jun 26, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 26.26.2
- Languages
- -
Fig: Food Scanner & Guide trajectory
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Fig: Food Scanner & Guide or Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker? v
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker earns about $4.76M per month, while Fig: Food Scanner & Guide earns about $88.4K. That is a 53.8× revenue gap (~$4.67M more per month for Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker). Annual revenue: Fig: Food Scanner & Guide ≈ $1.06M/year, Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker ≈ $57.06M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Fig: Food Scanner & Guide or Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker? v
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker leads with about 56.5M estimated downloads vs 813K for Fig: Food Scanner & Guide - a 69.6× gap. Fig: Food Scanner & Guide reports 500,000+ installs on Google Play. Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker reports 50,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Fig: Food Scanner & Guide and Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Fig: Food Scanner & Guide and Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker offer? v
Fig: Food Scanner & Guide: IAP range $4.79 - $79.99 per item. Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker: IAP range $6.99 - $299.99 per item. Fig: Food Scanner & Guide runs a "Subscription (~$19.57/mo)" monetization model; Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker runs "Subscription (~$45.79/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Fig: Food Scanner & Guide or Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker? v
Fig: Food Scanner & Guide edges ahead with ★ 4.5 vs ★ 4.4 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: Fig: Food Scanner & Guide 2K ratings, Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker 3K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Fig: Food Scanner & Guide vs Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $88.4K for Fig: Food Scanner & Guide and $4.76M for Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Fig: Food Scanner & Guide or Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.