Fill Storage vs Photo Recovery - File Recovery
Fill Storage
Arum Communications
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 1.3M installs
VS
Photo Recovery - File Recovery
Amobear VN Application
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 11.0M installs
Revenue winnerTied
Installs winner
Photo Recovery - File Recovery wins
+778% vs other
MAU winner
Photo Recovery - File Recovery wins
+424% vs other
Rating winner
Fill Storage wins
+8% vs other
Why Fill Storage is winning
Top 1 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Better app store reviews. Fill Storage sits at 4.26★ vs 3.95★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fill Storage report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Fill Storage
vs
Photo Recovery - File Recovery
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
=
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
=
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
1.3M
▶
11.0M
Monthly active users (est.)?
72K
▶
375K
App Store rating
4.26★
◀
3.95★
Total ratings
2K
▶
7K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Tools
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Aug 30, 2020
- Last updated
- Apr 10, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.6.8
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Tools
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 15, 2025
- Last updated
- Apr 16, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 260407.3.1.31
- Languages
- -
Fill Storage trajectory
Photo Recovery - File Recovery trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Fill Storage or Photo Recovery - File Recovery? v
Photo Recovery - File Recovery earns about $0 per month, while Fill Storage earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap. Annual revenue: Fill Storage ≈ $0/year, Photo Recovery - File Recovery ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Fill Storage or Photo Recovery - File Recovery? v
Photo Recovery - File Recovery leads with about 11.0M estimated downloads vs 1.3M for Fill Storage - a 8.8× gap. Fill Storage reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Photo Recovery - File Recovery reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Fill Storage and Photo Recovery - File Recovery in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Tools category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do Fill Storage and Photo Recovery - File Recovery have in-app purchases? v
Fill Storage does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Photo Recovery - File Recovery does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Fill Storage runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)", Photo Recovery - File Recovery runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)".
Which has better ratings, Fill Storage or Photo Recovery - File Recovery? v
Fill Storage edges ahead with ★ 4.3 vs ★ 4.0 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: Fill Storage 26 ratings, Photo Recovery - File Recovery 18 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Fill Storage vs Photo Recovery - File Recovery revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for Fill Storage and $0 for Photo Recovery - File Recovery are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Tools) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Fill Storage or Photo Recovery - File Recovery to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.