filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter vs ism: Retro Camera & Vintage

filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter

ARTTIC CO., LTD.
App Store
$1.5K/mo
~$18.3K/yr · 19K installs
VS

ism: Retro Camera & Vintage

MWM
App Store
$6.5K/mo
~$78.5K/yr · 769K installs
Revenue winner ism: Retro Camera & Vintage wins +330% vs other
Installs winner ism: Retro Camera & Vintage wins +3924% vs other
MAU winner ism: Retro Camera & Vintage wins +3924% vs other
Rating winner ism: Retro Camera & Vintage wins +0% vs other

Why ism: Retro Camera & Vintage is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. ism: Retro Camera & Vintage earns roughly 4× more per month than filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter - $6.5K vs $1.5K.
  2. Subscription model. ism: Retro Camera & Vintage runs a $0.83/mo subscription that compounds; filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
  3. Bigger install base. ism: Retro Camera & Vintage has ~769K lifetime installs vs filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter's ~19K - 40.2× the funnel top.
  4. More monetization surfaces. ism: Retro Camera & Vintage runs 9 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.

→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full ism: Retro Camera & Vintage report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter
vs
ism: Retro Camera & Vintage
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$1.5K
▶
$6.5K
Annual revenue (est.)
$18.3K
▶
$78.5K
Lifetime installs (est.)
19K
▶
769K
Monthly active users (est.)?
6K
▶
243K
App Store rating
4.73★
▶
4.73★
Total ratings
382
▶
10K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$0.83
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
▶
9 tiers

filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter

ARTTIC CO., LTD.
App Store
Category
Photo & Video
Price
USD2.99
Released
Nov 9, 2022
Last updated
Jun 29, 2026
File size
89.2 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
1.2.16
Languages
English, Japanese, Korean, Chinese, Chinese
View full filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter report →

ism: Retro Camera & Vintage

MWM
App Store
Category
Photo & Video
Price
Free
Released
Nov 4, 2021
Last updated
Jun 25, 2026
File size
205.6 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
7.43.2
Languages
English
View full ism: Retro Camera & Vintage report →

filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

ism: Retro Camera & Vintage trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

Related app pages

filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter App Store page →ism: Retro Camera & Vintage App Store page →

Related comparisons

Filmhwa Hwa Min S Filter iOS vs Youtube iOSFilmhwa Hwa Min S Filter iOS vs Promptsmart PRO Teleprompter iOSFilmhwa Hwa Min S Filter iOS vs Photopills iOSCapcut Photo Video Editor iOS vs Filmhwa Hwa Min S Filter iOSFilmhwa Hwa Min S Filter iOS vs Instagram iOSCanva AI Video Photo Editor iOS vs Filmhwa Hwa Min S Filter iOS

Compare another pair

FAQ

Which makes more money, filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter or ism: Retro Camera & Vintage? v
ism: Retro Camera & Vintage earns about $6.5K per month, while filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter earns about $1.5K. That is a 4.3× revenue gap (~$5.0K more per month for ism: Retro Camera & Vintage). Annual revenue: filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter ≈ $18.3K/year, ism: Retro Camera & Vintage ≈ $78.5K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter or ism: Retro Camera & Vintage? v
ism: Retro Camera & Vintage leads with about 769K estimated downloads vs 19K for filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter - a 40.2× gap. filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter's App Store downloads are estimated from 380 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. ism: Retro Camera & Vintage's App Store downloads are estimated from 10K ratings.
Are filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter and ism: Retro Camera & Vintage in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photo & Video category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter and ism: Retro Camera & Vintage offer? v
filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter: no IAP detected on the public listing. ism: Retro Camera & Vintage: IAP range 9 tiers detected. filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter runs a "Paid app ($2.99)" monetization model; ism: Retro Camera & Vintage runs "Subscription (~$0.83/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter or ism: Retro Camera & Vintage? v
ism: Retro Camera & Vintage edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.7 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter 380 ratings, ism: Retro Camera & Vintage 10K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter vs ism: Retro Camera & Vintage revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $1.5K for filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter and $6.5K for ism: Retro Camera & Vintage are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photo & Video) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter or ism: Retro Camera & Vintage to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.