filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter vs PhotoBoost - AI Photo Enhancer
filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter
ARTTIC CO., LTD.
App Store
$1.5K/mo
~$18.4K/yr · 19K installs
VS
PhotoBoost - AI Photo Enhancer
SMART MEDIA INTERNET MARKETING LTD
App Store
$37.8K/mo
~$453.5K/yr · 374K installs
Revenue winner
PhotoBoost - AI Photo Enhancer wins
+2362% vs other
Installs winner
PhotoBoost - AI Photo Enhancer wins
+1845% vs other
MAU winner
PhotoBoost - AI Photo Enhancer wins
+1826% vs other
Rating winner
filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter wins
+4% vs other
Why PhotoBoost - AI Photo Enhancer is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- PhotoBoost - AI Photo Enhancer earns roughly 25× more per month than filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter - $37.8K vs $1.5K.
- Subscription model. PhotoBoost - AI Photo Enhancer runs a $9.99/mo subscription that compounds; filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. PhotoBoost - AI Photo Enhancer has ~374K lifetime installs vs filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter's ~19K - 19.4× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. PhotoBoost - AI Photo Enhancer runs 3 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full PhotoBoost - AI Photo Enhancer report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter
vs
PhotoBoost - AI Photo Enhancer
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$1.5K
▶
$37.8K
Annual revenue (est.)
$18.4K
▶
$453.5K
Lifetime installs (est.)
19K
▶
374K
Monthly active users (est.)?
6K
▶
117K
App Store rating
4.73★
◀
4.56★
Total ratings
385
▶
5K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$9.99
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
▶
3 tiers
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- USD2.99
- Released
- Nov 9, 2022
- Last updated
- Jun 29, 2026
- File size
- 89.2 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.2.16
- Languages
- English, Japanese, Korean, Chinese, Chinese
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Aug 17, 2022
- Last updated
- Jun 30, 2026
- File size
- 112.1 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.85.0
- Languages
- English
filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter trajectory
PhotoBoost - AI Photo Enhancer trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter or PhotoBoost - AI Photo Enhancer? v
PhotoBoost - AI Photo Enhancer earns about $37.8K per month, while filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter earns about $1.5K. That is a 24.6× revenue gap (~$36.3K more per month for PhotoBoost - AI Photo Enhancer). Annual revenue: filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter ≈ $18.4K/year, PhotoBoost - AI Photo Enhancer ≈ $453.5K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter or PhotoBoost - AI Photo Enhancer? v
PhotoBoost - AI Photo Enhancer leads with about 374K estimated downloads vs 19K for filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter - a 19.4× gap. filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter's App Store downloads are estimated from 384 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. PhotoBoost - AI Photo Enhancer's App Store downloads are estimated from 5K ratings.
Are filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter and PhotoBoost - AI Photo Enhancer in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photo & Video category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter and PhotoBoost - AI Photo Enhancer offer? v
filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter: no IAP detected on the public listing. PhotoBoost - AI Photo Enhancer: IAP range 3 tiers detected. filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter runs a "Paid app ($2.99)" monetization model; PhotoBoost - AI Photo Enhancer runs "Subscription (~$9.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter or PhotoBoost - AI Photo Enhancer? v
filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter 384 ratings, PhotoBoost - AI Photo Enhancer 5K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter vs PhotoBoost - AI Photo Enhancer revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $1.5K for filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter and $37.8K for PhotoBoost - AI Photo Enhancer are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photo & Video) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter or PhotoBoost - AI Photo Enhancer to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.