Fit Me Now: Try On Clothes vs Estyl
Fit Me Now: Try On Clothes
Puddle Labs
App Store
$179/mo
~$2.1K/yr · 3K installs
VS
Estyl
Estyl
Google Play
$728/mo
~$8.7K/yr · 12K installs
Revenue winner
Estyl wins
+307% vs other
Installs winner
Estyl wins
+287% vs other
MAU winner
Estyl wins
+260% vs other
Rating winner
Fit Me Now: Try On Clothes wins
+500% vs other
Why Estyl is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Estyl earns roughly 4× more per month than Fit Me Now: Try On Clothes - $728 vs $179.
- Subscription model. Estyl runs a $15.31/mo subscription that compounds; Fit Me Now: Try On Clothes relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Estyl has ~12K lifetime installs vs Fit Me Now: Try On Clothes's ~3K - 3.9× the funnel top.
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Fit Me Now: Try On Clothes
vs
Estyl
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$179
▶
$728
Annual revenue (est.)
$2.1K
▶
$8.7K
Lifetime installs (est.)
3K
▶
12K
Monthly active users (est.)?
558
▶
2K
App Store rating
5.00★
◀
-
Total ratings
1
◀
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$15.31
IAP tiers detected
3 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Shopping
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 29, 2026
- Last updated
- May 6, 2026
- File size
- 10.0 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.0.2
- Languages
- English, Korean
- Category
- Shopping
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 30, 2025
- Last updated
- May 4, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 3.6.8
- Languages
- -
Fit Me Now: Try On Clothes trajectory
Estyl trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Fit Me Now: Try On Clothes or Estyl? v
Estyl earns about $728 per month, while Fit Me Now: Try On Clothes earns about $179. That is a 4.1× revenue gap (~$549 more per month for Estyl). Annual revenue: Fit Me Now: Try On Clothes ≈ $2.1K/year, Estyl ≈ $8.7K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Fit Me Now: Try On Clothes or Estyl? v
Estyl leads with about 12K estimated downloads vs 3K for Fit Me Now: Try On Clothes - a 3.9× gap. Fit Me Now: Try On Clothes's App Store downloads are estimated from 1 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Estyl reports 10,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Fit Me Now: Try On Clothes and Estyl in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Shopping category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Fit Me Now: Try On Clothes and Estyl offer? v
Fit Me Now: Try On Clothes: IAP range 3 tiers detected. Estyl: IAP range $4.99 - $46.99 per item. Fit Me Now: Try On Clothes runs a "Free + one-time IAP (3 tiers)" monetization model; Estyl runs "Subscription (~$15.31/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Fit Me Now: Try On Clothes or Estyl? v
Fit Me Now: Try On Clothes edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 5.0 stars). Rating volume: Fit Me Now: Try On Clothes 1 ratings, Estyl 0 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Fit Me Now: Try On Clothes vs Estyl revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $179 for Fit Me Now: Try On Clothes and $728 for Estyl are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Shopping) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Fit Me Now: Try On Clothes or Estyl to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.