Fit Path: Exercises for Women vs MacroFactor - Macro Tracker

Fit Path: Exercises for Women

Deep Flow Apps
Google Play
$174.9K/mo
~$2.10M/yr · 2.1M installs
VS

MacroFactor - Macro Tracker

Stronger By Science Technologies LLC
Google Play
$95.1K/mo
~$1.14M/yr · 1.3M installs
Revenue winner Fit Path: Exercises for Women wins +84% vs other
Installs winner Fit Path: Exercises for Women wins +58% vs other
MAU winner Fit Path: Exercises for Women wins +74% vs other
Rating winner MacroFactor - Macro Tracker wins +4% vs other

Why Fit Path: Exercises for Women is winning

Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Fit Path: Exercises for Women earns roughly 2× more per month than MacroFactor - Macro Tracker - $174.9K vs $95.1K.
  2. Premium pricing. Fit Path: Exercises for Women charges $16.72/mo vs MacroFactor - Macro Tracker's $11.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
  3. Bigger install base. Fit Path: Exercises for Women has ~2.1M lifetime installs vs MacroFactor - Macro Tracker's ~1.3M - 1.6× the funnel top.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fit Path: Exercises for Women report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Fit Path: Exercises for Women
vs
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$174.9K
$95.1K
Annual revenue (est.)
$2.10M
$1.14M
Lifetime installs (est.)
2.1M
1.3M
Monthly active users (est.)?
292K
168K
App Store rating
4.47★
4.66★
Total ratings
3K
13K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$16.72
$11.99
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers

Fit Path: Exercises for Women

Deep Flow Apps
Google Play
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Jan 14, 2025
Last updated
Apr 10, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
1.3.1
Languages
-
View full Fit Path: Exercises for Women report →

MacroFactor - Macro Tracker

Stronger By Science Technologies LLC
Google Play
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Sep 14, 2021
Last updated
Mar 24, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone 10+
Version
5.7.6
Languages
-
View full MacroFactor - Macro Tracker report →

Fit Path: Exercises for Women trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

MacroFactor - Macro Tracker trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

FAQ

Which makes more money, Fit Path: Exercises for Women or MacroFactor - Macro Tracker? v
Fit Path: Exercises for Women earns about $174.9K per month, while MacroFactor - Macro Tracker earns about $95.1K. That is a 1.8× revenue gap (~$79.8K more per month for Fit Path: Exercises for Women). Annual revenue: Fit Path: Exercises for Women ≈ $2.10M/year, MacroFactor - Macro Tracker ≈ $1.14M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Fit Path: Exercises for Women or MacroFactor - Macro Tracker? v
Fit Path: Exercises for Women leads with about 2.1M estimated downloads vs 1.3M for MacroFactor - Macro Tracker - a 1.6× gap. Fit Path: Exercises for Women reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. MacroFactor - Macro Tracker reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Fit Path: Exercises for Women and MacroFactor - Macro Tracker in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Fit Path: Exercises for Women and MacroFactor - Macro Tracker offer? v
Fit Path: Exercises for Women: IAP range $6.99 - $39.99 per item. MacroFactor - Macro Tracker: IAP range $9.99 - $89.99 per item. Fit Path: Exercises for Women runs a "Subscription (~$16.72/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; MacroFactor - Macro Tracker runs "Subscription (~$11.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Fit Path: Exercises for Women or MacroFactor - Macro Tracker? v
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Fit Path: Exercises for Women 64 ratings, MacroFactor - Macro Tracker 2K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Fit Path: Exercises for Women vs MacroFactor - Macro Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $174.9K for Fit Path: Exercises for Women and $95.1K for MacroFactor - Macro Tracker are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Fit Path: Exercises for Women or MacroFactor - Macro Tracker to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.