Fit To Serve Group vs KitchenCost - Recipe Costing

Fit To Serve Group

Fit To Serve, LLC
App Store
$197/mo
~$2.4K/yr · 6K installs
VS

KitchenCost - Recipe Costing

Daesung Park
App Store
$2/mo
~$23/yr · 400 installs
Revenue winner Fit To Serve Group wins +9750% vs other
Installs winner Fit To Serve Group wins +1438% vs other
MAU winner Fit To Serve Group wins +882% vs other
Rating winner KitchenCost - Recipe Costing wins +6% vs other

Why Fit To Serve Group is winning

Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Fit To Serve Group earns roughly 99× more per month than KitchenCost - Recipe Costing - $197 vs $2.
  2. Premium pricing. Fit To Serve Group charges $4.99/mo vs KitchenCost - Recipe Costing's $2.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
  3. Bigger install base. Fit To Serve Group has ~6K lifetime installs vs KitchenCost - Recipe Costing's ~400 - 15.4× the funnel top.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fit To Serve Group report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Fit To Serve Group
vs
KitchenCost - Recipe Costing
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$197
$2
Annual revenue (est.)
$2.4K
$23
Lifetime installs (est.)
6K
400
Monthly active users (est.)?
467.4
47.6
App Store rating
4.58★
4.86★
Total ratings
123
7
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$4.99
$2.99
IAP tiers detected
3 tiers
=
3 tiers

Fit To Serve Group

Fit To Serve, LLC
App Store
Category
Food & Drink
Price
Free
Released
Oct 20, 2021
Last updated
May 8, 2024
File size
56.9 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
2.1.2
Languages
English
View full Fit To Serve Group report →

KitchenCost - Recipe Costing

Daesung Park
App Store
Category
Food & Drink
Price
Free
Released
Dec 25, 2025
Last updated
Jun 29, 2026
File size
48.4 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
1.7.170
Languages
English, French, German, Indonesian, Italian, Japanese +6 more
View full KitchenCost - Recipe Costing report →

Fit To Serve Group trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

KitchenCost - Recipe Costing trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

FAQ

Which makes more money, Fit To Serve Group or KitchenCost - Recipe Costing? v
Fit To Serve Group earns about $197 per month, while KitchenCost - Recipe Costing earns about $2. That is a 98.5× revenue gap (~$195 more per month for Fit To Serve Group). Annual revenue: Fit To Serve Group ≈ $2.4K/year, KitchenCost - Recipe Costing ≈ $23/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Fit To Serve Group or KitchenCost - Recipe Costing? v
Fit To Serve Group leads with about 6K estimated downloads vs 400 for KitchenCost - Recipe Costing - a 15.4× gap. Fit To Serve Group's App Store downloads are estimated from 123 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. KitchenCost - Recipe Costing's App Store downloads are estimated from 7 ratings.
Are Fit To Serve Group and KitchenCost - Recipe Costing in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Fit To Serve Group and KitchenCost - Recipe Costing offer? v
Fit To Serve Group: IAP range 3 tiers detected. KitchenCost - Recipe Costing: IAP range 3 tiers detected. Fit To Serve Group runs a "Subscription (~$12.99/mo)" monetization model; KitchenCost - Recipe Costing runs "Subscription (~$1.25/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Fit To Serve Group or KitchenCost - Recipe Costing? v
KitchenCost - Recipe Costing edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: Fit To Serve Group 123 ratings, KitchenCost - Recipe Costing 7 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Fit To Serve Group vs KitchenCost - Recipe Costing revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $197 for Fit To Serve Group and $2 for KitchenCost - Recipe Costing are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Fit To Serve Group or KitchenCost - Recipe Costing to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.