Fit To Serve Group vs Wine Maps
Fit To Serve Group
Fit To Serve, LLC
App Store
$197/mo
~$2.4K/yr · 6K installs
VS
Wine Maps
Jonathan Lord
App Store
$143/mo
~$1.7K/yr · 5K installs
Revenue winner
Fit To Serve Group wins
+38% vs other
Installs winner
Fit To Serve Group wins
+14% vs other
MAU winner
Wine Maps wins
+16% vs other
Rating winner
Wine Maps wins
+0% vs other
Why Fit To Serve Group is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Aggressive pricing. Fit To Serve Group undercuts at $4.99/mo vs $21.68/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- More monetization surfaces. Fit To Serve Group runs 3 IAP tiers vs 1 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fit To Serve Group report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Fit To Serve Group
vs
Wine Maps
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$197
◀
$143
Annual revenue (est.)
$2.4K
◀
$1.7K
Lifetime installs (est.)
6K
◀
5K
Monthly active users (est.)?
467.4
▶
540
App Store rating
4.58★
▶
4.59★
Total ratings
123
◀
108
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$4.99
▶
$21.68
IAP tiers detected
3 tiers
◀
1 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 20, 2021
- Last updated
- May 8, 2024
- File size
- 56.9 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.1.2
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- USD0.99
- Released
- Aug 28, 2012
- Last updated
- Dec 16, 2024
- File size
- 48.4 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 5.2.2
- Languages
- English, French
Fit To Serve Group trajectory
Wine Maps trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Fit To Serve Group or Wine Maps? v
Fit To Serve Group earns about $197 per month, while Wine Maps earns about $143. That is a 1.4× revenue gap (~$54 more per month for Fit To Serve Group). Annual revenue: Fit To Serve Group ≈ $2.4K/year, Wine Maps ≈ $1.7K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Fit To Serve Group or Wine Maps? v
Fit To Serve Group leads with about 6K estimated downloads vs 5K for Wine Maps - a 1.1× gap. Fit To Serve Group's App Store downloads are estimated from 123 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Wine Maps's App Store downloads are estimated from 108 ratings.
Are Fit To Serve Group and Wine Maps in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Fit To Serve Group and Wine Maps offer? v
Fit To Serve Group: IAP range 3 tiers detected. Wine Maps: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Fit To Serve Group runs a "Subscription (~$12.99/mo)" monetization model; Wine Maps runs "Paid app ($0.99)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Fit To Serve Group or Wine Maps? v
Wine Maps edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: Fit To Serve Group 123 ratings, Wine Maps 108 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Fit To Serve Group vs Wine Maps revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $197 for Fit To Serve Group and $143 for Wine Maps are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Fit To Serve Group or Wine Maps to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.