Google Health (Fitbit) vs adidas Running: Run tracker
Google Health (Fitbit)
Google
App Store
$1.36M/mo
~$16.32M/yr · 101.5M installs
VS
adidas Running: Run tracker
adidas
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 96.5M installs
Revenue winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+136022500% vs other
Installs winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+5% vs other
MAU winner
adidas Running: Run tracker wins
+3% vs other
Rating winner
adidas Running: Run tracker wins
+3% vs other
Why Google Health (Fitbit) is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Google Health (Fitbit) earns roughly 1360225× more per month than adidas Running: Run tracker - $1.36M vs $0.
- Subscription model. Google Health (Fitbit) runs a $9.99/mo subscription that compounds; adidas Running: Run tracker relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Charts placement. Google Health (Fitbit) ranks #94 on the US grossing chart (the other app is unranked) - chart placement is a self-reinforcing flywheel.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Google Health (Fitbit) report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Google Health (Fitbit)
vs
adidas Running: Run tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$1.36M
◀
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$16.32M
◀
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
101.5M
◀
96.5M
Monthly active users (est.)?
7.2M
▶
7.4M
App Store rating
4.49★
▶
4.63★
Total ratings
677K
▶
1.7M
US grossing rank
#94
◀
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.99
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
2 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 18, 2011
- Last updated
- Jun 23, 2026
- File size
- 548.8 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 5.02.1
- Languages
- Bulgarian, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English +26 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- May 12, 2010
- Last updated
- Jun 2, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
Google Health (Fitbit) trajectory
adidas Running: Run tracker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Google Health (Fitbit) or adidas Running: Run tracker? v
Google Health (Fitbit) earns about $1.36M per month, while adidas Running: Run tracker earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$1.36M more per month for Google Health (Fitbit)). Annual revenue: Google Health (Fitbit) ≈ $16.32M/year, adidas Running: Run tracker ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Google Health (Fitbit) or adidas Running: Run tracker? v
Google Health (Fitbit) leads with about 101.5M estimated downloads vs 96.5M for adidas Running: Run tracker - a 1.1× gap. Google Health (Fitbit)'s App Store downloads are estimated from 677K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. adidas Running: Run tracker reports 50,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Google Health (Fitbit) and adidas Running: Run tracker in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Google Health (Fitbit) and adidas Running: Run tracker offer? v
Google Health (Fitbit): IAP range 2 tiers detected. adidas Running: Run tracker: no IAP detected on the public listing. Google Health (Fitbit) runs a "Subscription (~$6.67/mo) · calibrated by US grossing rank #94" monetization model; adidas Running: Run tracker runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Google Health (Fitbit) or adidas Running: Run tracker? v
adidas Running: Run tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: Google Health (Fitbit) 677K ratings, adidas Running: Run tracker 25K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Google Health (Fitbit) vs adidas Running: Run tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $1.36M for Google Health (Fitbit) and $0 for adidas Running: Run tracker are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Google Health (Fitbit) or adidas Running: Run tracker to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.