Fitbit: Health & Fitness vs AI Calorie Tracker - Fit AI
Fitbit: Health & Fitness
Google
App Store
$5.41M/mo
~$64.94M/yr · 98.7M installs
VS
AI Calorie Tracker - Fit AI
HEYOS
Google Play
$9.2K/mo
~$110.0K/yr · 57K installs
Revenue winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+58931% vs other
Installs winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+173282% vs other
MAU winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+156128% vs other
Rating winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+3% vs other
Why Fitbit: Health & Fitness is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns roughly 590× more per month than AI Calorie Tracker - Fit AI - $5.41M vs $9.2K.
- Aggressive pricing. Fitbit: Health & Fitness undercuts at $9.99/mo vs $14.13/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Fitbit: Health & Fitness has ~98.7M lifetime installs vs AI Calorie Tracker - Fit AI's ~57K - 1733.8× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fitbit: Health & Fitness report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Fitbit: Health & Fitness
vs
AI Calorie Tracker - Fit AI
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$5.41M
◀
$9.2K
Annual revenue (est.)
$64.94M
◀
$110.0K
Lifetime installs (est.)
98.7M
◀
57K
Monthly active users (est.)?
25.2M
◀
16K
App Store rating
4.53★
◀
4.39★
Total ratings
658K
◀
1K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.99
▶
$14.13
IAP tiers detected
2 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 18, 2011
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- 450.2 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 4.69
- Languages
- Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, ET, Finnish +22 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Nov 25, 2024
- Last updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.8.6
- Languages
- -
Fitbit: Health & Fitness trajectory
AI Calorie Tracker - Fit AI trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or AI Calorie Tracker - Fit AI? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns about $5.41M per month, while AI Calorie Tracker - Fit AI earns about $9.2K. That is a 590.3× revenue gap (~$5.40M more per month for Fitbit: Health & Fitness). Annual revenue: Fitbit: Health & Fitness ≈ $64.94M/year, AI Calorie Tracker - Fit AI ≈ $110.0K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or AI Calorie Tracker - Fit AI? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness leads with about 98.7M estimated downloads vs 57K for AI Calorie Tracker - Fit AI - a 1733.8× gap. Fitbit: Health & Fitness's App Store downloads are estimated from 658K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. AI Calorie Tracker - Fit AI reports 50,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Fitbit: Health & Fitness and AI Calorie Tracker - Fit AI in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Fitbit: Health & Fitness and AI Calorie Tracker - Fit AI offer? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness: IAP range 2 tiers detected. AI Calorie Tracker - Fit AI: IAP range $4.99 - $39.99 per item. Fitbit: Health & Fitness runs a "Subscription (~$6.67/mo)" monetization model; AI Calorie Tracker - Fit AI runs "Subscription (~$14.13/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or AI Calorie Tracker - Fit AI? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness edges ahead with ★ 4.5 vs ★ 4.4 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: Fitbit: Health & Fitness 658K ratings, AI Calorie Tracker - Fit AI 14 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Fitbit: Health & Fitness vs AI Calorie Tracker - Fit AI revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $5.41M for Fitbit: Health & Fitness and $9.2K for AI Calorie Tracker - Fit AI are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Fitbit: Health & Fitness or AI Calorie Tracker - Fit AI to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.