Fitbit: Health & Fitness vs Blood Sugar & Diabetes Tracker
Fitbit: Health & Fitness
Google
App Store
$2.71M/mo
~$32.47M/yr · 98.7M installs
VS
Blood Sugar & Diabetes Tracker
PidomTech
Google Play
$773.4K/mo
~$9.28M/yr · 18.7M installs
Revenue winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+250% vs other
Installs winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+427% vs other
MAU winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+817% vs other
Rating winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+18% vs other
Why Fitbit: Health & Fitness is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns roughly 3× more per month than Blood Sugar & Diabetes Tracker - $2.71M vs $773.4K.
- Premium pricing. Fitbit: Health & Fitness charges $9.99/mo vs Blood Sugar & Diabetes Tracker's $5.46/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Fitbit: Health & Fitness has ~98.7M lifetime installs vs Blood Sugar & Diabetes Tracker's ~18.7M - 5.3× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Fitbit: Health & Fitness sits at 4.53★ vs 3.83★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fitbit: Health & Fitness report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$2.71M
◀
$773.4K
Annual revenue (est.)
$32.47M
◀
$9.28M
Lifetime installs (est.)
98.7M
◀
18.7M
Monthly active users (est.)?
12.5M
◀
1.4M
App Store rating
4.53★
◀
3.83★
Total ratings
658K
◀
12K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.99
◀
$5.46
IAP tiers detected
2 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 18, 2011
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- 450.2 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 4.69
- Languages
- Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, ET, Finnish +22 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Feb 14, 2025
- Last updated
- Apr 15, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 2.0.3
- Languages
- -
Fitbit: Health & Fitness trajectory
Blood Sugar & Diabetes Tracker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or Blood Sugar & Diabetes Tracker? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns about $2.71M per month, while Blood Sugar & Diabetes Tracker earns about $773.4K. That is a 3.5× revenue gap (~$1.93M more per month for Fitbit: Health & Fitness). Annual revenue: Fitbit: Health & Fitness ≈ $32.47M/year, Blood Sugar & Diabetes Tracker ≈ $9.28M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or Blood Sugar & Diabetes Tracker? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness leads with about 98.7M estimated downloads vs 18.7M for Blood Sugar & Diabetes Tracker - a 5.3× gap. Fitbit: Health & Fitness's App Store downloads are estimated from 658K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Blood Sugar & Diabetes Tracker reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Fitbit: Health & Fitness and Blood Sugar & Diabetes Tracker in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Fitbit: Health & Fitness and Blood Sugar & Diabetes Tracker offer? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness: IAP range 2 tiers detected. Blood Sugar & Diabetes Tracker: IAP range $1.49 - $19.99 per item. Fitbit: Health & Fitness runs a "Subscription (~$6.67/mo)" monetization model; Blood Sugar & Diabetes Tracker runs "Subscription (~$5.46/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or Blood Sugar & Diabetes Tracker? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness edges ahead with ★ 4.5 vs ★ 3.8 (gap of 0.7 stars). Rating volume: Fitbit: Health & Fitness 658K ratings, Blood Sugar & Diabetes Tracker 289 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Fitbit: Health & Fitness vs Blood Sugar & Diabetes Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $2.71M for Fitbit: Health & Fitness and $773.4K for Blood Sugar & Diabetes Tracker are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Fitbit: Health & Fitness or Blood Sugar & Diabetes Tracker to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
