Fitbit: Health & Fitness vs Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes
Fitbit: Health & Fitness
Google
App Store
$2.71M/mo
~$32.47M/yr · 98.7M installs
VS
Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes
Chello Publishing Limited
Google Play
$39.7K/mo
~$476.6K/yr · 342K installs
Revenue winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+6713% vs other
Installs winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+28753% vs other
MAU winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+19496% vs other
Rating winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+65% vs other
Why Fitbit: Health & Fitness is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns roughly 68× more per month than Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes - $2.71M vs $39.7K.
- Aggressive pricing. Fitbit: Health & Fitness undercuts at $9.99/mo vs $18.10/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Fitbit: Health & Fitness has ~98.7M lifetime installs vs Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes's ~342K - 288.5× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Fitbit: Health & Fitness sits at 4.53★ vs 2.74★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fitbit: Health & Fitness report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Fitbit: Health & Fitness
vs
Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$2.71M
◀
$39.7K
Annual revenue (est.)
$32.47M
◀
$476.6K
Lifetime installs (est.)
98.7M
◀
342K
Monthly active users (est.)?
12.5M
◀
64K
App Store rating
4.53★
◀
2.74★
Total ratings
658K
◀
3K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.99
▶
$18.10
IAP tiers detected
2 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 18, 2011
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- 450.2 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 4.69
- Languages
- Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, ET, Finnish +22 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Mar 16, 2012
- Last updated
- Apr 24, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 5.52.1
- Languages
- -
Fitbit: Health & Fitness trajectory
Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns about $2.71M per month, while Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes earns about $39.7K. That is a 68.1× revenue gap (~$2.67M more per month for Fitbit: Health & Fitness). Annual revenue: Fitbit: Health & Fitness ≈ $32.47M/year, Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes ≈ $476.6K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness leads with about 98.7M estimated downloads vs 342K for Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes - a 288.5× gap. Fitbit: Health & Fitness's App Store downloads are estimated from 658K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Fitbit: Health & Fitness and Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Fitbit: Health & Fitness and Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes offer? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness: IAP range 2 tiers detected. Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes: IAP range $7.99 - $40.99 per item. Fitbit: Health & Fitness runs a "Subscription (~$6.67/mo)" monetization model; Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes runs "Subscription (~$18.10/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness edges ahead with ★ 4.5 vs ★ 2.7 (gap of 1.8 stars). Rating volume: Fitbit: Health & Fitness 658K ratings, Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes 43 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Fitbit: Health & Fitness vs Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $2.71M for Fitbit: Health & Fitness and $39.7K for Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Fitbit: Health & Fitness or Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.