Fitbit: Health & Fitness vs Fastrack Smart World
Fitbit: Health & Fitness
Google
App Store
$5.41M/mo
~$64.94M/yr · 98.7M installs
VS
Fastrack Smart World
Titan Company Limited
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 13.6M installs
Revenue winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+541138900% vs other
Installs winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+624% vs other
MAU winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+2429% vs other
Rating winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+18% vs other
Why Fitbit: Health & Fitness is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns roughly 5411389× more per month than Fastrack Smart World - $5.41M vs $0.
- Subscription model. Fitbit: Health & Fitness runs a $9.99/mo subscription that compounds; Fastrack Smart World relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Fitbit: Health & Fitness has ~98.7M lifetime installs vs Fastrack Smart World's ~13.6M - 7.2× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Fitbit: Health & Fitness sits at 4.53★ vs 3.83★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fitbit: Health & Fitness report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Fitbit: Health & Fitness
vs
Fastrack Smart World
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$5.41M
◀
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$64.94M
◀
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
98.7M
◀
13.6M
Monthly active users (est.)?
25.2M
◀
995K
App Store rating
4.53★
◀
3.83★
Total ratings
658K
◀
246K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.99
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
2 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 18, 2011
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- 450.2 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 4.69
- Languages
- Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, ET, Finnish +22 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Mar 3, 2022
- Last updated
- Mar 17, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 6.12.0.751360
- Languages
- -
Fitbit: Health & Fitness trajectory
Fastrack Smart World trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or Fastrack Smart World? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns about $5.41M per month, while Fastrack Smart World earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$5.41M more per month for Fitbit: Health & Fitness). Annual revenue: Fitbit: Health & Fitness ≈ $64.94M/year, Fastrack Smart World ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or Fastrack Smart World? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness leads with about 98.7M estimated downloads vs 13.6M for Fastrack Smart World - a 7.2× gap. Fitbit: Health & Fitness's App Store downloads are estimated from 658K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Fastrack Smart World reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Fitbit: Health & Fitness and Fastrack Smart World in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Fitbit: Health & Fitness and Fastrack Smart World offer? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness: IAP range 2 tiers detected. Fastrack Smart World: no IAP detected on the public listing. Fitbit: Health & Fitness runs a "Subscription (~$6.67/mo)" monetization model; Fastrack Smart World runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or Fastrack Smart World? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness edges ahead with ★ 4.5 vs ★ 3.8 (gap of 0.7 stars). Rating volume: Fitbit: Health & Fitness 658K ratings, Fastrack Smart World 70 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Fitbit: Health & Fitness vs Fastrack Smart World revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $5.41M for Fitbit: Health & Fitness and $0 for Fastrack Smart World are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Fitbit: Health & Fitness or Fastrack Smart World to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.