Fitbit: Health & Fitness vs Fitatu AI Calorie Counter
Fitbit: Health & Fitness
Google
App Store
$5.41M/mo
~$64.94M/yr · 98.7M installs
VS
Fitatu AI Calorie Counter
V Team
Google Play
$745.6K/mo
~$8.95M/yr · 9.2M installs
Revenue winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+626% vs other
Installs winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+972% vs other
MAU winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+1825% vs other
Rating winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+1% vs other
Why Fitbit: Health & Fitness is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns roughly 7× more per month than Fitatu AI Calorie Counter - $5.41M vs $745.6K.
- Premium pricing. Fitbit: Health & Fitness charges $9.99/mo vs Fitatu AI Calorie Counter's $6.89/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Fitbit: Health & Fitness has ~98.7M lifetime installs vs Fitatu AI Calorie Counter's ~9.2M - 10.7× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fitbit: Health & Fitness report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Fitbit: Health & Fitness
vs
Fitatu AI Calorie Counter
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$5.41M
◀
$745.6K
Annual revenue (est.)
$64.94M
◀
$8.95M
Lifetime installs (est.)
98.7M
◀
9.2M
Monthly active users (est.)?
25.2M
◀
1.3M
App Store rating
4.53★
◀
4.47★
Total ratings
658K
◀
149K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.99
◀
$6.89
IAP tiers detected
2 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 18, 2011
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- 450.2 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 4.69
- Languages
- Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, ET, Finnish +22 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 23, 2015
- Last updated
- Apr 21, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 4.14.1
- Languages
- -
Fitbit: Health & Fitness trajectory
Fitatu AI Calorie Counter trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or Fitatu AI Calorie Counter? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns about $5.41M per month, while Fitatu AI Calorie Counter earns about $745.6K. That is a 7.3× revenue gap (~$4.67M more per month for Fitbit: Health & Fitness). Annual revenue: Fitbit: Health & Fitness ≈ $64.94M/year, Fitatu AI Calorie Counter ≈ $8.95M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or Fitatu AI Calorie Counter? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness leads with about 98.7M estimated downloads vs 9.2M for Fitatu AI Calorie Counter - a 10.7× gap. Fitbit: Health & Fitness's App Store downloads are estimated from 658K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Fitatu AI Calorie Counter reports 5,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Fitbit: Health & Fitness and Fitatu AI Calorie Counter in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Fitbit: Health & Fitness and Fitatu AI Calorie Counter offer? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness: IAP range 2 tiers detected. Fitatu AI Calorie Counter: IAP range $0.99 - $47.90 per item. Fitbit: Health & Fitness runs a "Subscription (~$6.67/mo)" monetization model; Fitatu AI Calorie Counter runs "Subscription (~$6.89/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or Fitatu AI Calorie Counter? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness edges ahead with ★ 4.5 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: Fitbit: Health & Fitness 658K ratings, Fitatu AI Calorie Counter 80 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Fitbit: Health & Fitness vs Fitatu AI Calorie Counter revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $5.41M for Fitbit: Health & Fitness and $745.6K for Fitatu AI Calorie Counter are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Fitbit: Health & Fitness or Fitatu AI Calorie Counter to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.