Fitbit: Health & Fitness vs Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition

Fitbit: Health & Fitness

Google
App Store
$5.41M/mo
~$64.94M/yr · 98.7M installs
VS

Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition

Fitness Camp
Google Play
$25.2K/mo
~$302.8K/yr · 210K installs
Revenue winner Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins +21348% vs other
Installs winner Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins +46901% vs other
MAU winner Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins +65038% vs other
Rating winner Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins +453% vs other

Why Fitbit: Health & Fitness is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns roughly 214× more per month than Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition - $5.41M vs $25.2K.
  2. Aggressive pricing. Fitbit: Health & Fitness undercuts at $9.99/mo vs $30.02/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
  3. Bigger install base. Fitbit: Health & Fitness has ~98.7M lifetime installs vs Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition's ~210K - 470.0× the funnel top.
  4. Better app store reviews. Fitbit: Health & Fitness sits at 4.53★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fitbit: Health & Fitness report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Fitbit: Health & Fitness
vs
Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$5.41M
$25.2K
Annual revenue (est.)
$64.94M
$302.8K
Lifetime installs (est.)
98.7M
210K
Monthly active users (est.)?
25.2M
39K
App Store rating
4.53★
-
Total ratings
658K
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.99
$30.02
IAP tiers detected
2 tiers
0 tiers

Fitbit: Health & Fitness

Google
App Store
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Oct 18, 2011
Last updated
May 7, 2026
File size
450.2 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
4.69
Languages
Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, ET, Finnish +22 more
View full Fitbit: Health & Fitness report →

Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition

Fitness Camp
Google Play
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Jan 21, 2025
Last updated
May 4, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
1.0.65
Languages
-
View full Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition report →

Fitbit: Health & Fitness trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

FAQ

Which makes more money, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns about $5.41M per month, while Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition earns about $25.2K. That is a 214.5× revenue gap (~$5.39M more per month for Fitbit: Health & Fitness). Annual revenue: Fitbit: Health & Fitness ≈ $64.94M/year, Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition ≈ $302.8K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness leads with about 98.7M estimated downloads vs 210K for Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition - a 470.0× gap. Fitbit: Health & Fitness's App Store downloads are estimated from 658K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Fitbit: Health & Fitness and Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Fitbit: Health & Fitness and Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition offer? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness: IAP range 2 tiers detected. Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition: IAP range $9.49 - $94.99 per item. Fitbit: Health & Fitness runs a "Subscription (~$6.67/mo)" monetization model; Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition runs "Subscription (~$30.02/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.5 stars). Rating volume: Fitbit: Health & Fitness 658K ratings, Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition 0 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Fitbit: Health & Fitness vs Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $5.41M for Fitbit: Health & Fitness and $25.2K for Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Fitbit: Health & Fitness or Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.