Fitbit: Health & Fitness vs Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition
Fitbit: Health & Fitness
Google
App Store
$5.41M/mo
~$64.94M/yr · 98.7M installs
VS
Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition
Fitness Camp
App Store
$30/mo
~$355/yr · 400 installs
Revenue winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+18037863% vs other
Installs winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+24665675% vs other
MAU winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+24473723% vs other
Rating winner
Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition wins
+3% vs other
Why Fitbit: Health & Fitness is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns roughly 180380× more per month than Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition - $5.41M vs $30.
- Premium pricing. Fitbit: Health & Fitness charges $9.99/mo vs Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition's $8.90/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Fitbit: Health & Fitness has ~98.7M lifetime installs vs Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition's ~400 - 246657.8× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fitbit: Health & Fitness report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$5.41M
◀
$30
Annual revenue (est.)
$64.94M
◀
$355
Lifetime installs (est.)
98.7M
◀
400
Monthly active users (est.)?
25.2M
◀
102.8
App Store rating
4.53★
▶
4.67★
Total ratings
658K
◀
6
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.99
◀
$8.90
IAP tiers detected
2 tiers
▶
5 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 18, 2011
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- 450.2 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 4.69
- Languages
- Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, ET, Finnish +22 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 11, 2025
- Last updated
- May 4, 2026
- File size
- 176.5 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.0.65
- Languages
- French
Fitbit: Health & Fitness trajectory
Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns about $5.41M per month, while Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition earns about $30. That is a 180379.6× revenue gap (~$5.41M more per month for Fitbit: Health & Fitness). Annual revenue: Fitbit: Health & Fitness ≈ $64.94M/year, Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition ≈ $355/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness leads with about 98.7M estimated downloads vs 400 for Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition - a 246657.8× gap. Fitbit: Health & Fitness's App Store downloads are estimated from 658K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition's App Store downloads are estimated from 6 ratings.
Are Fitbit: Health & Fitness and Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Fitbit: Health & Fitness and Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition offer? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness: IAP range 2 tiers detected. Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition: IAP range 5 tiers detected. Fitbit: Health & Fitness runs a "Subscription (~$6.67/mo)" monetization model; Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition runs "Subscription (~$8.90/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition? v
Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: Fitbit: Health & Fitness 658K ratings, Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition 6 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Fitbit: Health & Fitness vs Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $5.41M for Fitbit: Health & Fitness and $30 for Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Fitbit: Health & Fitness or Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
