Fitbit: Health & Fitness vs HeartSnap:Health Tracker
Fitbit: Health & Fitness
Google
App Store
$5.41M/mo
~$64.94M/yr · 98.7M installs
VS
HeartSnap:Health Tracker
MC Baby Sleep Expert Limited
App Store
$8.1K/mo
~$97.5K/yr · 296K installs
Revenue winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+66510% vs other
Installs winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+33219% vs other
MAU winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+33219% vs other
Rating winner
HeartSnap:Health Tracker wins
+0% vs other
Why Fitbit: Health & Fitness is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns roughly 666× more per month than HeartSnap:Health Tracker - $5.41M vs $8.1K.
- Premium pricing. Fitbit: Health & Fitness charges $9.99/mo vs HeartSnap:Health Tracker's $3.33/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Fitbit: Health & Fitness has ~98.7M lifetime installs vs HeartSnap:Health Tracker's ~296K - 333.2× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fitbit: Health & Fitness report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Fitbit: Health & Fitness
vs
HeartSnap:Health Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$5.41M
◀
$8.1K
Annual revenue (est.)
$64.94M
◀
$97.5K
Lifetime installs (est.)
98.7M
◀
296K
Monthly active users (est.)?
25.2M
◀
76K
App Store rating
4.53★
▶
4.53★
Total ratings
658K
◀
3K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.99
◀
$3.33
IAP tiers detected
2 tiers
=
2 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 18, 2011
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- 450.2 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 4.69
- Languages
- Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, ET, Finnish +22 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Aug 20, 2025
- Last updated
- Jan 14, 2026
- File size
- 117.9 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 1.0.7
- Languages
- Arabic, English, French, German, Indonesian, Italian +9 more
Fitbit: Health & Fitness trajectory
HeartSnap:Health Tracker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or HeartSnap:Health Tracker? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns about $5.41M per month, while HeartSnap:Health Tracker earns about $8.1K. That is a 666.1× revenue gap (~$5.40M more per month for Fitbit: Health & Fitness). Annual revenue: Fitbit: Health & Fitness ≈ $64.94M/year, HeartSnap:Health Tracker ≈ $97.5K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or HeartSnap:Health Tracker? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness leads with about 98.7M estimated downloads vs 296K for HeartSnap:Health Tracker - a 333.2× gap. Fitbit: Health & Fitness's App Store downloads are estimated from 658K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. HeartSnap:Health Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 3K ratings.
Are Fitbit: Health & Fitness and HeartSnap:Health Tracker in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Fitbit: Health & Fitness and HeartSnap:Health Tracker offer? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness: IAP range 2 tiers detected. HeartSnap:Health Tracker: IAP range 2 tiers detected. Fitbit: Health & Fitness runs a "Subscription (~$6.67/mo)" monetization model; HeartSnap:Health Tracker runs "Subscription (~$3.33/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or HeartSnap:Health Tracker? v
HeartSnap:Health Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.5 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: Fitbit: Health & Fitness 658K ratings, HeartSnap:Health Tracker 3K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Fitbit: Health & Fitness vs HeartSnap:Health Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $5.41M for Fitbit: Health & Fitness and $8.1K for HeartSnap:Health Tracker are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Fitbit: Health & Fitness or HeartSnap:Health Tracker to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.