Fitbit: Health & Fitness vs iCardiac: Heart Rate & Health

Fitbit: Health & Fitness

Google
App Store
$5.41M/mo
~$64.94M/yr · 98.7M installs
VS

iCardiac: Heart Rate & Health

BEGAMOB GLOBAL LIMITED
App Store
$75.2K/mo
~$902.6K/yr · 2.7M installs
Revenue winner Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins +7095% vs other
Installs winner Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins +3559% vs other
MAU winner Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins +3503% vs other
Rating winner iCardiac: Heart Rate & Health wins +5% vs other

Why Fitbit: Health & Fitness is winning

Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns roughly 72× more per month than iCardiac: Heart Rate & Health - $5.41M vs $75.2K.
  2. Premium pricing. Fitbit: Health & Fitness charges $9.99/mo vs iCardiac: Heart Rate & Health's $3.33/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
  3. Bigger install base. Fitbit: Health & Fitness has ~98.7M lifetime installs vs iCardiac: Heart Rate & Health's ~2.7M - 36.6× the funnel top.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fitbit: Health & Fitness report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Fitbit: Health & Fitness
vs
iCardiac: Heart Rate & Health
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$5.41M
$75.2K
Annual revenue (est.)
$64.94M
$902.6K
Lifetime installs (est.)
98.7M
2.7M
Monthly active users (est.)?
25.2M
698K
App Store rating
4.53★
4.77★
Total ratings
658K
25K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.99
$3.33
IAP tiers detected
2 tiers
6 tiers

Fitbit: Health & Fitness

Google
App Store
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Oct 18, 2011
Last updated
May 7, 2026
File size
450.2 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
4.69
Languages
Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, ET, Finnish +22 more
View full Fitbit: Health & Fitness report →

iCardiac: Heart Rate & Health

BEGAMOB GLOBAL LIMITED
App Store
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Oct 16, 2023
Last updated
Mar 28, 2026
File size
263.4 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
3.3.5
Languages
Arabic, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French +14 more
View full iCardiac: Heart Rate & Health report →

Fitbit: Health & Fitness trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

iCardiac: Heart Rate & Health trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

FAQ

Which makes more money, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or iCardiac: Heart Rate & Health? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns about $5.41M per month, while iCardiac: Heart Rate & Health earns about $75.2K. That is a 71.9× revenue gap (~$5.34M more per month for Fitbit: Health & Fitness). Annual revenue: Fitbit: Health & Fitness ≈ $64.94M/year, iCardiac: Heart Rate & Health ≈ $902.6K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or iCardiac: Heart Rate & Health? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness leads with about 98.7M estimated downloads vs 2.7M for iCardiac: Heart Rate & Health - a 36.6× gap. Fitbit: Health & Fitness's App Store downloads are estimated from 658K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. iCardiac: Heart Rate & Health's App Store downloads are estimated from 25K ratings.
Are Fitbit: Health & Fitness and iCardiac: Heart Rate & Health in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Fitbit: Health & Fitness and iCardiac: Heart Rate & Health offer? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness: IAP range 2 tiers detected. iCardiac: Heart Rate & Health: IAP range 6 tiers detected. Fitbit: Health & Fitness runs a "Subscription (~$6.67/mo)" monetization model; iCardiac: Heart Rate & Health runs "Subscription (~$3.33/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Fitbit: Health & Fitness or iCardiac: Heart Rate & Health? v
iCardiac: Heart Rate & Health edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Fitbit: Health & Fitness 658K ratings, iCardiac: Heart Rate & Health 25K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Fitbit: Health & Fitness vs iCardiac: Heart Rate & Health revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $5.41M for Fitbit: Health & Fitness and $75.2K for iCardiac: Heart Rate & Health are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Fitbit: Health & Fitness or iCardiac: Heart Rate & Health to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.